Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

The bill would set duties to cut food waste

Senate step 6 of 7 · Unfinished

It is a government bill. Introduced by the Government. It was introduced on 8 June 2022. Introduced by: Gobierno.

Official title: Government bill on the prevention of food loss and waste.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000107· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would require all players in the food chain to avoid food waste by following a priority order: first donate or redistribute for human consumption, then process products still fit to eat, then use them for animal feed, and finally recycle or recover them.
  2. Food chain players would have to have a prevention plan and sign agreements to donate their surplus, unless it is unworkable or the store has 1,300 square meters of sales space or less. Microenterprises would be exempt from these duties.
  3. Restaurants and bars would have to let customers take home, at no extra cost, the food they have not eaten, except at all-you-can-eat buffets, and would have to state this clearly on the menu.
  4. Organizations that hand out donated food would have to guarantee traceability, not sell the products, and distribute them without discrimination. They would not be civilly or administratively liable for defects that are not obvious and that the food already had when received.
  5. The Government would draw up a Strategic Plan for prevention and reduction, the autonomous communities would create their own programs, and the Ministry of Agriculture would publish an annual report on the results of inspections.
  6. The bill would set fines of up to €2,000 for minor offenses, between €2,001 and €60,000 for serious ones, and between €60,001 and €500,000 for very serious ones. The autonomous communities could raise these limits.

Who it affects

  • Food production, processing and distribution companies: They would need a prevention plan, follow the priority order, and sign agreements to donate surplus food.
  • Restaurants and bars: They would have to let customers take leftover food home at no extra cost and say so on the menu.
  • Food banks and social organizations: They would have to guarantee traceability, keep food hygienic, and distribute without discrimination, with no selling allowed.
  • Public authorities: They would run awareness campaigns, publish good practice guides, carry out inspections, and issue an annual report.
  • Consumers: They could take home uneaten restaurant food and would receive information and training against food waste.

Words worth knowing

Jerarquía de prioridades (priority order)
A mandatory order for deciding what to do with leftover food: donate it first, then process it, then use it for animal feed, and finally recycle it.
Trazabilidad (traceability)
Being able to track a food item from receipt to delivery through records.
Consumo preferente (best-before date)
The date until which a product keeps its best quality; after it, the food may still be safe to eat, unlike the use-by date.

It summarizes the text passed by the full Congreso. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 6 of 7 steps. It reached Senate, and today it is unfinished.

  1. Introduced8 June 2022Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted14 June 2022The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendments17 June 2022Groups propose changes.
  4. Committee11 November 2022A committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenary26 April 2023All 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senate11 May 2023The Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 9 official steps on a timeline
Jun 2022Sept 2022Dec 2022Mar 202311. 8 June 2022: Presentación22. 14 June 2022: Comisión de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación Publicación desde 14/06/2022 hasta 17/06/202233. 14 June 2022: Calificación44. 17 June 2022: Comisión de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación Enmiendas desde 17/06/2022 hasta 11/11/202255. 11 November 2022: Comisión de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación Informe desde 11/11/2022 hasta 20/04/202366. 20 April 2023: Comisión de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación Dictamen desde 20/04/2023 hasta 26/04/202377. 26 April 2023: Pleno Aprobación desde 26/04/2023 hasta 11/05/202388. 11 May 2023: Senado desde 11/05/2023 hasta 30/05/202399. 30 May 2023: Concluido - (Caducado) desde 30/05/2023 hasta 16/06/2023

11 May 2023

How did the plenary vote?

More votes in favour 269 yes · 0 no · 70 abst.

Voted on: Vote on the report on the Government bill on the prevention of food loss and waste.

This law had 60 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 81 of sitting 259· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Ciudadanos, Gcup-ec-gc, GPlu and Popular en el Congreso. 6 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 48 most voted in favour; in 0, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 48
  • Against: 0
  • Abstained: 1
  • Tie: 3
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu5
5 in favour
Republicano13
13 abst.
Socialista120
119 in favour · 1 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)6
6 in favour
Mixto11
7 in favour · 2 abst. · 2 did not vote
Ciudadanos9
9 in favour
Gcup-ec-gc33
30 in favour · 3 did not vote
GPlu12
7 in favour · 4 abst. · 1 did not vote
Popular en el Congreso87
86 in favour · 1 did not vote
VOX52
51 abst. · 1 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.

It was presented again:

The same initiative in the other chamber:

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.