What it is
Bill would let the State take control of SAREB Sociedad de Gestión de Activos procedentes de la Reestructuración Bancaria, a company created in 2012 to manage and sell assets from banks in crisis.
Amendments step 3 of 7 · UnfinishedIt is a government bill. Introduced by the Government. It was introduced on 3 February 2022. Introduced by: Gobierno.
Official title: Government bill amending Ley 9/2012, of 14 November, on the restructuring and resolution of credit institutions; Ley 11/2015, of 18 June, on the recovery and resolution of credit institutions and investment service firms; and Real Decreto 1559/2012, of 15 November, establishing the legal regime of asset management companies, in relation to the legal regime of the Asset Management Company arising from the Banking Restructuring (originating from Real Decreto-ley 1/2022, of 18 January).
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000090· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would remove the limits on the State's stake in SAREB and allow the FROB Fondo de Reestructuración Ordenada Bancaria, the public body that manages the restructuring and resolution of banks. to acquire a stake of 50% or more in order to take control of the company.
- It would keep SAREB under private law even if the FROB holds a majority, so it would not become a state-owned commercial company. Its contracting rules would be adapted, and it would have at most 3 months to adjust after public control is taken.
- It would have the FROB's reduced-composition Ruling Commission decide on its portfolio of holdings, shares and other instruments, keeping supervisors out of those decisions. Companies in the portfolio would not be considered state-owned commercial companies.
- It would allow SAREB to transfer properties to public bodies or nonprofits for social housing or other high social value policies, weighing social usefulness within its value maximization goal. Notarial and registry steps for these transfers would carry no fees.
- It would clarify the labor reform in royal decree-law A rule with the force of law that the Government passes because it is urgent. It applies from its publication, but the Congreso must validate it within 30 days or it lapses. 32/2021: it corrects letter d) of Article 84.2 of the Workers' Statute and adds a safeguard for the replacement rate set each year in the State Budget for public sector staff.
- It would provide that, during 2022, declarations of high tourist traffic zones use the 2017 to 2019 average instead of 2021 data, since 2021 figures do not yet reflect the tourism sector's usual situation.
Who it affects
- SAREB and the FROB: The FROB could take control of SAREB, which would change its contracting, oversight and asset transfer rules.
- Public sector employees and staff: The rules on their contracts and the applicable replacement rate would be clarified.
- Shops in tourist areas: They could keep or obtain the high tourist traffic zone declaration using 2017 to 2019 data.
- Public bodies and nonprofits: They could receive housing or properties transferred by SAREB for social housing.
Words worth knowing
- SAREB
- Sociedad de Gestión de Activos procedentes de la Reestructuración Bancaria, a company created in 2012 to manage and sell assets from banks in crisis.
- FROB
- Fondo de Reestructuración Ordenada Bancaria, the public body that manages the restructuring and resolution of banks.
- Real decreto-ley
- Royal decree-law: a rule with the force of law that the Government can pass urgently, though Congress must later approve it.
- Tasa de reposición
- Replacement rate: the yearly limit set in the Budget on how many public sector positions can be filled.
- Zona de gran afluencia turística
- High tourist traffic zone: an area that, due to many visitors, may have more flexible store opening hours.
- royal decree-law
- A rule with the force of law that the Government passes because it is urgent. It applies from its publication, but the Congreso must validate it within 30 days or it lapses.
- decree-law
- A rule with the force of law that the Government passes because it is urgent. It applies from its publication, but the Congreso must validate it within 30 days or it lapses.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 3 of 7 steps. It reached Amendments, and today it is unfinished.
- Introduced3 February 2022Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted15 February 2022The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments18 February 2022Groups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 5 official steps on a timeline
17 March 2022
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Vote on the request for the Plenary of the Chamber to take over the deliberation and final vote on the Government bill amending Law 9/2012, of 14 November, on the restructuring and resolution of credit institutions; Law 11/2015, of 18 June, on the recovery and resolution of credit institutions and investment service firms; and Royal Decree 1559/2012, of 15 November, establishing the legal regime of asset management companies, regarding the legal regime of the Asset Management Company arising from the Banking Restructuring (arising from Royal Decree-Law 1/2022, of 18 January), submitted by the Republican Parliamentary Group.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 22 of sitting 162· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no
- Albacete More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 12 yes · 0 no
- Almería More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Asturias More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
- Ávila More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Badajoz More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 31 yes · 0 no
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Burgos More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Cáceres More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no
- Cantabria More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Córdoba More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Cuenca More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Girona More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Granada More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no
- Huelva More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Huesca More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Illes Balears More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no
- Jaén More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- La Rioja More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Las Palmas More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no
- León More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Lleida More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Lugo More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 34 yes · 0 no
- Málaga More votes in favour 11 yes · 0 no
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 10 yes · 0 no
- Navarra More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Ourense More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Pontevedra More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Segovia More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 12 yes · 0 no
- Soria More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Teruel More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Toledo More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 15 yes · 0 no
- Valladolid More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Socialista, Mixto, Ciudadanos, Gcup-ec-gc, GPlu, Popular en el Congreso and VOX.
By province: in 52 most voted in favour; in 0, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 52
- Against: 0
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Republicano | 13 | 13 in favour |
| Socialista | 120 | 118 in favour · 2 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 6 | 6 did not vote |
| Mixto | 10 | 9 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Ciudadanos | 9 | 9 in favour |
| Gcup-ec-gc | 34 | 33 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| GPlu | 12 | 12 in favour |
| Popular en el Congreso | 88 | 86 in favour · 2 did not vote |
| VOX | 52 | 51 in favour · 1 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.
It has not been presented again yet.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000090
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 22 of sitting 162
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.