Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Bill would let the State take control of SAREB Sociedad de Gestión de Activos procedentes de la Reestructuración Bancaria, a company created in 2012 to manage and sell assets from banks in crisis.

Amendments step 3 of 7 · Unfinished

It is a government bill. Introduced by the Government. It was introduced on 3 February 2022. Introduced by: Gobierno.

Official title: Government bill amending Ley 9/2012, of 14 November, on the restructuring and resolution of credit institutions; Ley 11/2015, of 18 June, on the recovery and resolution of credit institutions and investment service firms; and Real Decreto 1559/2012, of 15 November, establishing the legal regime of asset management companies, in relation to the legal regime of the Asset Management Company arising from the Banking Restructuring (originating from Real Decreto-ley 1/2022, of 18 January).

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000090· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would remove the limits on the State's stake in SAREB and allow the FROB Fondo de Reestructuración Ordenada Bancaria, the public body that manages the restructuring and resolution of banks. to acquire a stake of 50% or more in order to take control of the company.
  2. It would keep SAREB under private law even if the FROB holds a majority, so it would not become a state-owned commercial company. Its contracting rules would be adapted, and it would have at most 3 months to adjust after public control is taken.
  3. It would have the FROB's reduced-composition Ruling Commission decide on its portfolio of holdings, shares and other instruments, keeping supervisors out of those decisions. Companies in the portfolio would not be considered state-owned commercial companies.
  4. It would allow SAREB to transfer properties to public bodies or nonprofits for social housing or other high social value policies, weighing social usefulness within its value maximization goal. Notarial and registry steps for these transfers would carry no fees.
  5. It would clarify the labor reform in royal decree-law A rule with the force of law that the Government passes because it is urgent. It applies from its publication, but the Congreso must validate it within 30 days or it lapses. 32/2021: it corrects letter d) of Article 84.2 of the Workers' Statute and adds a safeguard for the replacement rate set each year in the State Budget for public sector staff.
  6. It would provide that, during 2022, declarations of high tourist traffic zones use the 2017 to 2019 average instead of 2021 data, since 2021 figures do not yet reflect the tourism sector's usual situation.

Who it affects

  • SAREB and the FROB: The FROB could take control of SAREB, which would change its contracting, oversight and asset transfer rules.
  • Public sector employees and staff: The rules on their contracts and the applicable replacement rate would be clarified.
  • Shops in tourist areas: They could keep or obtain the high tourist traffic zone declaration using 2017 to 2019 data.
  • Public bodies and nonprofits: They could receive housing or properties transferred by SAREB for social housing.

Words worth knowing

SAREB
Sociedad de Gestión de Activos procedentes de la Reestructuración Bancaria, a company created in 2012 to manage and sell assets from banks in crisis.
FROB
Fondo de Reestructuración Ordenada Bancaria, the public body that manages the restructuring and resolution of banks.
Real decreto-ley
Royal decree-law: a rule with the force of law that the Government can pass urgently, though Congress must later approve it.
Tasa de reposición
Replacement rate: the yearly limit set in the Budget on how many public sector positions can be filled.
Zona de gran afluencia turística
High tourist traffic zone: an area that, due to many visitors, may have more flexible store opening hours.
royal decree-law
A rule with the force of law that the Government passes because it is urgent. It applies from its publication, but the Congreso must validate it within 30 days or it lapses.
decree-law
A rule with the force of law that the Government passes because it is urgent. It applies from its publication, but the Congreso must validate it within 30 days or it lapses.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 3 of 7 steps. It reached Amendments, and today it is unfinished.

  1. Introduced3 February 2022Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted15 February 2022The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendments18 February 2022Groups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 5 official steps on a timeline
Mar 2022Jun 2022Sept 2022Dec 2022Mar 202311. 3 February 2022: Presentación22. 15 February 2022: Comisión de Asuntos Económicos y Transformación Digital Publicación desde 15/02/2022 hasta 18/02/202233. 15 February 2022: Calificación44. 18 February 2022: Comisión de Asuntos Económicos y Transformación Digital Enmiendas desde 18/02/2022 hasta 30/05/202355. 30 May 2023: Concluido - (Caducado) desde 30/05/2023 hasta 16/06/2023

17 March 2022

How did the plenary vote?

More votes in favour 336 yes · 0 no

Voted on: Vote on the request for the Plenary of the Chamber to take over the deliberation and final vote on the Government bill amending Law 9/2012, of 14 November, on the restructuring and resolution of credit institutions; Law 11/2015, of 18 June, on the recovery and resolution of credit institutions and investment service firms; and Royal Decree 1559/2012, of 15 November, establishing the legal regime of asset management companies, regarding the legal regime of the Asset Management Company arising from the Banking Restructuring (arising from Royal Decree-Law 1/2022, of 18 January), submitted by the Republican Parliamentary Group.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 22 of sitting 162· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Socialista, Mixto, Ciudadanos, Gcup-ec-gc, GPlu, Popular en el Congreso and VOX.

By province: in 52 most voted in favour; in 0, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 52
  • Against: 0
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu5
5 in favour
Republicano13
13 in favour
Socialista120
118 in favour · 2 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)6
6 did not vote
Mixto10
9 in favour · 1 did not vote
Ciudadanos9
9 in favour
Gcup-ec-gc34
33 in favour · 1 did not vote
GPlu12
12 in favour
Popular en el Congreso88
86 in favour · 2 did not vote
VOX52
51 in favour · 1 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.

It has not been presented again yet.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.