Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Bill would change how the local capital gains tax is calculated

Committee step 4 of 7 · Unfinished

It is a government bill. Introduced by the Government. It was introduced on 2 December 2021. Introduced by: Gobierno.

Official title: Government bill adapting the consolidated text of the Law Regulating Local Public Finances approved by Real Decreto Legislativo 2/2004, of 5 March, to the recent case law of the Constitutional Court regarding the Tax on the Increase in the Value of Urban Land (originating from Real Decreto-ley 26/2021, of 8 November).

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000080· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would exempt from the local capital gains tax (Plusvalía municipal Popular name for the tax on the increase in value of urban land (Impuesto sobre el Incremento de Valor de los Terrenos de Naturaleza Urbana): it taxes the rise in value of urban land between purchase and sale.) any land transfer where the land did not actually increase in value. The interested party must report the transfer and provide the deeds for both the sale and the purchase.
  2. It would change how the tax base is calculated: the previous annual percentages would be replaced by maximum coefficients based on how many years the land was held, ranging from 0.14 for less than one year to 0.45 for 20 years or more. These coefficients would be updated yearly, for example through the national budget laws.
  3. If the taxpayer shows that the actual gain is lower than the base calculated with the coefficients, that actual gain would be used as the tax base. City councils could verify these cases.
  4. City councils could apply a reduction coefficient of up to 15 percent on the cadastral value of the land to adjust for how up to date it is, and a reduction of up to 60 percent during the first five years after a cadastral review.
  5. City councils that levy this tax would have to adapt their tax ordinances within six months of the rule taking effect. Until then, the new rule and its maximum coefficients would apply directly.
  6. The rule would take effect the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette (Boletín Oficial del Estado), and the Government and the Ministry of Finance would be empowered to issue the rules needed to apply it.

Who it affects

  • Owners who sell or inherit land or an apartment: They could show there was no gain in value, or that it was lower than calculated, and pay less or no tax.
  • City councils: They must adapt their tax ordinances within six months and may apply reductions and verify declared values.
  • Taxpayers who file self-assessments: The city council could only check that they applied the rules correctly, without assigning different values.

Words worth knowing

Plusvalía municipal
Popular name for the tax on the increase in value of urban land (Impuesto sobre el Incremento de Valor de los Terrenos de Naturaleza Urbana): it taxes the rise in value of urban land between purchase and sale.
Base imponible
Tax base: the amount on which the tax is applied to work out what is owed.
Valor catastral
Cadastral value: the value the administration assigns to a property for tax purposes.
Ordenanza fiscal
Tax ordinance: the rule each city council approves to regulate the taxes it manages.
Devengo
Accrual: the moment the tax is deemed to arise, here when the land is transferred.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 4 of 7 steps. It reached Committee, and today it is unfinished.

  1. Introduced2 December 2021Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted14 December 2021The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendments17 December 2021Groups propose changes.
  4. Committee1 February 2022A committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 7 official steps on a timeline
Dec 2021Mar 2022Jun 2022Sept 2022Dec 2022Mar 202311. 2 December 2021: Presentación22. 14 December 2021: Comisión de Hacienda y Función Pública Publicación desde 14/12/2021 hasta 17/12/202133. 14 December 2021: Calificación44. 17 December 2021: Comisión de Hacienda y Función Pública Enmiendas desde 17/12/2021 hasta 30/05/202355. 30 December 2021: Comisión de Hacienda y Función Pública Mesa - Calificación desde 30/12/2021 hasta 01/02/202266. 1 February 2022: Comisión de Hacienda y Función Pública Debate de totalidad desde 01/02/2022 hasta 17/02/202277. 30 May 2023: Concluido - (Caducado) desde 30/05/2023 hasta 16/06/2023

17 February 2022

How did the plenary vote?

More votes in favour 331 yes · 6 no

Voted on: Request by the Republican Parliamentary Group for the Plenary of the Chamber to take over the deliberation and final vote on the bill.

This law had 3 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 8 of sitting 152· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Socialista, Mixto, Ciudadanos, Gcup-ec-gc, GPlu, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. Against, most of Vasco (EAJ-PNV). 1 deputy voted differently from their group.

By province: in 52 most voted in favour; in 0, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 52
  • Against: 0
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu5
4 in favour · 1 did not vote
Republicano13
12 in favour · 1 did not vote
Socialista120
119 in favour · 1 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)6
5 against · 1 did not vote
Mixto10
9 in favour · 1 did not vote
Ciudadanos9
8 in favour · 1 did not vote
Gcup-ec-gc34
33 in favour · 1 against
GPlu12
10 in favour · 2 did not vote
Popular en el Congreso88
86 in favour · 2 did not vote
VOX52
50 in favour · 2 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.

It has not been presented again yet.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.