What it is
Bill to create a fund spreading renewable energy costs across all energy sources
It is a government bill. Introduced by the Government. It was introduced on 2 June 2021. Introduced by: Gobierno.
Official title: Government bill creating the National Fund for the Sustainability of the Electric System.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000058· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would create the National Fund for the Sustainability of the Electricity System (FNSSE), a fund without legal personality that would finance policies promoting renewable energy, high-efficiency cogeneration and waste recovery, currently paid by electricity consumers through the charges on their power bills.
- The fund would be managed by the Institute for the Diversification and Saving of Energy (IDAE) and attached to the Ministry for the Ecological Transition and the Demographic Challenge, with a Monitoring and Control Committee overseeing its use, approving its budget and drawing up its annual accounts.
- Natural gas and electricity retailers, direct consumers of electricity and gas, wholesale operators of oil products and liquefied petroleum gases, and other consumers of these products would have to contribute to the fund. Contributions would be proportional to their energy sales or consumption, and rates would be set each year by ministerial order.
- The bill provides exemptions for certain sales, such as kerosene, agricultural gas oil or fuels for navigation, and compensation for road freight transport, passenger transport, taxis, vehicle rental with driver, and industrial consumers at risk of Carbon leakage When an industry relocates to a country with less strict climate rules to avoid decarbonization costs..
- It sets out a sanctions regime with very serious, serious and minor offenses, with fines of up to €60,000,000, which may not exceed 10% of the offender's turnover. Very serious offenses may also carry bans of up to three years.
- The new system would apply gradually and linearly over 5 years from entry into force; at the end of that period, the fund would cover all the costs and the contribution from electricity charges would disappear. For 2022, a per-unit energy contribution would be set from the first full calendar quarter after approval of the relevant order.
Who it affects
- Electricity consumers: Would see the share of renewable costs they pay through power bill charges reduced, gradually over 5 years.
- Gas and electricity retailers, oil product and LPG operators, and direct consumers: Would make annual contributions to the fund, proportional to their energy sales or consumption.
- Road freight and passenger transport companies, taxis and vehicle rental with driver: Could receive compensation for gas oil costs, capped at 50,000 liters per vehicle per year, or 5,000 for taxis and rental with driver.
- Industrial consumers of electricity and gas at risk of carbon leakage: Would be entitled to compensation for the impact of contributions on their final prices.
- Small consumers on a regulated price: The Voluntary Price for the Small Consumer would be modified within six months to include the reference retailers' contribution to the fund.
Words worth knowing
- RECORE
- Specific remuneration regime covering more than 60,000 renewable, cogeneration and waste installations. Its costs are what the fund would finance.
- Peajes y cargos (access tolls and charges)
- The regulated parts of the Spanish power bill: tolls pay for transmission and distribution networks, and charges pay the rest of the electricity system's costs.
- Carbon leakage
- When an industry relocates to a country with less strict climate rules to avoid decarbonization costs.
- Fondo sin personalidad jurídica (fund without legal personality)
- Money with its own purpose and management, but not an independent entity: it is administered within a public body, here IDAE.
- Caducidad del procedimiento (expiry of proceedings)
- If the administration fails to decide within the deadline (18 months here), the case is closed and the proceedings end.
It summarizes the drafting committee report. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 4 of 7 steps. It reached Committee, and today it is unfinished.
- Introduced2 June 2021Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted8 June 2021The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments11 June 2021Groups propose changes.
- Committee1 July 2021A committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 9 official steps on a timeline
13 September 2021
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Request for the Plenary of the Chamber to take over the deliberation and final vote on the Government bill creating the National Fund for the Sustainability of the Electricity System, presented by the Plural Parliamentary Group (Mr. Miquel i Valentí).
This law had 2 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 5 of sitting 114· updated 11 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Albacete Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 7 yes · 5 no
- Almería More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Araba/Álava More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Asturias More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Ávila More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Badajoz Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Barcelona More votes against 11 yes · 19 no · 1 abst.
- Bizkaia More votes against 1 yes · 6 no · 1 abst.
- Burgos Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 5 yes · 4 no
- Cantabria More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes against 1 yes · 4 no · 1 abst.
- Girona More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Granada More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Huelva More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Huesca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Illes Balears Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Jaén More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- La Rioja Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 3 yes · 4 no · 1 abst.
- León Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Lleida More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Lugo Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 20 yes · 17 no
- Málaga More votes in favour 6 yes · 4 no
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 6 yes · 4 no
- Navarra More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Ourense Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Segovia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Sevilla More votes against 5 yes · 7 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes against 1 yes · 5 no
- Teruel More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Toledo More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 8 yes · 6 no
- Valladolid More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Mixto, Ciudadanos, GPlu, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. Against, most of Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Gcup-ec-gc and Sin grupo. 10 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 21 most voted in favour; in 19, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 21
- Against: 19
- Tie: 12
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 5 | 3 in favour · 2 abst. |
| Republicano | 13 | 13 against |
| Socialista | 119 | 119 against |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 6 | 6 against |
| Mixto | 10 | 5 in favour · 2 against · 2 abst. · 1 did not vote |
| Ciudadanos | 9 | 8 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Gcup-ec-gc | 35 | 2 in favour · 33 against |
| GPlu | 12 | 9 in favour · 2 against · 1 did not vote |
| Sin grupo | 1 | 1 against |
| Popular en el Congreso | 88 | 88 in favour |
| VOX | 52 | 52 in favour |
What happens next
What happens now?
The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.
It has not been presented again yet.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000058
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 5 of sitting 114
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.