What it is
New rules against tax avoidance through hybrid cross-border arrangements
It is a government bill. Introduced by the Government. It was introduced on 25 March 2021. Introduced by: Gobierno.
Official title: Government bill to amend Law 27/2014, of November 27, on the Corporate Tax, and the consolidated text of the Non-Resident Income Tax Law, approved by Royal Legislative Decree 5/2004, of March 5, regarding hybrid asymmetries (originating from Royal Decree-Law 4/2021, of March 9).
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000051· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The law adds a new Article 15 bis to the Corporate income tax The personal income tax (IRPF in Spain): what people pay on what they earn from work, business or savings. that denies the deduction of expenses from transactions with related parties abroad when, due to different tax treatment between countries, those expenses do not generate taxed income in the other country. In some cases the denied expense can be deducted in the following three years if it is later offset by income taxed in both countries.
- The deduction is also denied for expenses that directly or indirectly finance hybrid mismatches arising in third countries, unless one of the affected countries has made an equivalent adjustment. The rules also cover hybrid permanent establishments, double deductions and tax residence mismatches.
- The rules also apply to transactions between unrelated parties if they are part of a structured arrangement, meaning a setup designed to exploit the tax advantage of the hybrid mismatch.
- The Non-Resident Income Tax gets its own rules for hybrid mismatches involving permanent establishments, and refers to the Corporate Income Tax rules for all other cases.
- The law repeals Article 15.j) of the Corporate Income Tax, the previous rule on hybrid financial instruments, and adjusts Article 16.1 to the new regulation.
- The law modifies the obligation to report assets held abroad (model 720) following a European court ruling, and changes the regime for unjustified capital gains under personal income tax. It takes effect the day after publication, applying to tax periods starting on or after January 1, 2020.
Who it affects
- Companies paying Corporate Income Tax that operate with related entities abroad: They may see the deduction of certain expenses denied when they create hybrid mismatches.
- Non-residents with a permanent establishment in Spain: The new Non-Resident Income Tax rules on non-deductible expenses apply to them.
- People with accounts, assets or virtual currencies abroad: They must keep reporting them to the Tax Agency under the adjusted model 720 regime.
- Personal income tax taxpayers: The regime for unjustified capital gains is updated.
Words worth knowing
- Asimetría híbrida (hybrid mismatch)
- A situation where two countries treat the same transaction or entity differently, allowing less tax to be paid, for example deducting an expense without the matching income being taxed anywhere.
- Persona o entidad vinculada (related party)
- A company or person closely linked to the taxpayer, for example through significant shareholdings, influence over its management or acting jointly.
- Establecimiento permanente (permanent establishment)
- A kind of branch of a foreign company in Spain, which pays tax there on its activities.
- Renta de doble inclusión (double inclusion income)
- Income taxed in both countries at the same time; it can offset expenses that could not previously be deducted.
- Mecanismo estructurado (structured arrangement)
- A setup or transaction designed to exploit the tax advantage of a hybrid mismatch.
- income tax
- The personal income tax (IRPF in Spain): what people pay on what they earn from work, business or savings.
It summarizes the law as published in the BOE. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.
- Introduced25 March 2021Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted6 April 2021The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments9 April 2021Groups propose changes.
- Committee10 June 2021A committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenaryno dateAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senate21 December 2021The Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOE24 February 2022It is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 10 official steps on a timeline
24 February 2022
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Government bill amending Law 27/2014, of November 27, on the Corporate Tax, and the consolidated text of the Non-Resident Income Tax Law, approved by Royal Legislative Decree 5/2004, of March 5, regarding hybrid asymmetries (originating from Royal Decree-Law 4/2021, of March 9). Block vote on the amendments from the Senate.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 18 of sitting 155· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Albacete More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 9 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Almería More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Asturias More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Ávila More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Badajoz More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Barcelona More votes in favour 19 yes · 0 no · 10 abst.
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Burgos More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Cáceres More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Cádiz More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Cantabria More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Ceuta Tie 0 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Córdoba More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Cuenca More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Girona More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Granada More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Huelva More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Huesca More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Illes Balears More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Jaén More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- La Rioja More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Las Palmas More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- León More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Lleida More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Lugo More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 28 yes · 0 no · 7 abst.
- Málaga More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Navarra More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Ourense More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Pontevedra More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Segovia More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Sevilla More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Soria More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Teruel More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Toledo More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 12 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Valladolid More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Zamora More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Ciudadanos, Gcup-ec-gc, GPlu and Popular en el Congreso. 3 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 50 most voted in favour; in 0, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 50
- Against: 0
- Abstained: 1
- Tie: 1
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 5 | 5 abst. |
| Republicano | 13 | 13 abst. |
| Socialista | 120 | 117 in favour · 3 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 6 | 5 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Mixto | 10 | 5 in favour · 2 abst. · 3 did not vote |
| Ciudadanos | 9 | 9 in favour |
| Gcup-ec-gc | 34 | 33 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| GPlu | 12 | 10 in favour · 1 abst. · 1 did not vote |
| Popular en el Congreso | 88 | 85 in favour · 3 did not vote |
| VOX | 52 | 49 abst. · 3 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.
The same initiative in the other chamber:
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000051
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 18 of sitting 155
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- BOE, BOE-A-2022-3712
The law as published.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.