Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Dismissal for missed work days is eliminated

BOE step 7 of 7 · Passed

It is a government bill. Introduced by the Government. It was introduced on 25 March 2020. Introduced by: Gobierno.

Official title: Government bill repealing objective dismissal due to work absences established in Article 52.d) of the consolidated text of the Workers' Statute, approved by Royal Legislative Decree 2/2015, of October 23 (originating from Royal Decree-Law 4/2020, of February 18).

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000008· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The law eliminates the objective dismissal for missed work days, which allowed companies to dismiss workers whose absences, even justified ones, exceeded certain percentages.
  2. Until now, this dismissal was applied automatically once the absence percentages were reached, without checking whether it was appropriate and proportionate in each case.
  3. The Court of Justice of the European Union had ruled that this type of dismissal can discriminate based on disability, since people with disabilities or long-term illnesses may have more short medical leaves.
  4. It can also affect women more, since they mostly handle caregiving tasks, so it could amount to indirect discrimination based on sex.
  5. The law replaces royal decree-law A rule with the force of law that the Government passes because it is urgent. It applies from its publication, but the Congreso must validate it within 30 days or it lapses. 4/2020, of February 18, which had already removed this type of dismissal, and now does so with the rank of a law.
  6. The law takes effect the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette (Boletín Oficial del Estado).

Who it affects

  • Workers: They can no longer be objectively dismissed for accumulating absences, including short medical leaves.
  • People with disabilities or long-term illnesses: They are protected from a dismissal that could discriminate against them for having more medical absences.
  • Companies: They lose this low-cost way of ending contracts; unjustified absences can still be punished through other means, such as disciplinary dismissal.
  • Women with caregiving responsibilities: They avoid a dismissal risk that could penalize absences related to work-life balance.

Words worth knowing

Despido objetivo (objective dismissal)
A dismissal a company can decide for reasons set by law, paying compensation, without the worker having committed a serious breach.
Derogar (repeal)
To do away with a law or part of it.
Discriminación indirecta (indirect discrimination)
A situation where a seemingly neutral rule harms a specific group more, such as people with disabilities or women.
Contingencias comunes (common contingencies)
Medical leaves due to illness or accident not related to work.
royal decree-law
A rule with the force of law that the Government passes because it is urgent. It applies from its publication, but the Congreso must validate it within 30 days or it lapses.
decree-law
A rule with the force of law that the Government passes because it is urgent. It applies from its publication, but the Congreso must validate it within 30 days or it lapses.

It summarizes the law as published in the BOE. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.

  1. Introduced25 March 2020Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted30 March 2020The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendments6 April 2020Groups propose changes.
  4. Committee12 May 2020A committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenary11 June 2020All 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senate17 June 2020The Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOE1 July 2020It is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 9 official steps on a timeline
Mar 2020Apr 2020May 2020Jun 202011. 25 March 2020: Presentación22. 30 March 2020: Comisión de Trabajo, Inclusión, Seguridad Social y Migraciones Publicación desde 30/03/2020 hasta 06/04/202033. 30 March 2020: Calificación44. 6 April 2020: Comisión de Trabajo, Inclusión, Seguridad Social y Migraciones Enmiendas desde 06/04/2020 hasta 14/05/202055. 22 April 2020: Comisión de Trabajo, Inclusión, Seguridad Social y Migraciones Mesa - Calificación desde 22/04/2020 hasta 12/05/202066. 12 May 2020: Comisión de Trabajo, Inclusión, Seguridad Social y Migraciones Debate de totalidad desde 12/05/2020 hasta 11/06/202077. 11 June 2020: Pleno Aprobación desde 11/06/2020 hasta 17/06/202088. 17 June 2020: Senado desde 17/06/2020 hasta 01/07/202099. 1 July 2020: Concluido - (Aprobado sin modificaciones) desde 01/07/2020 hasta 03/11/2020

17 June 2020

How did the plenary vote?

More votes in favour 203 yes · 55 no · 91 abst.

Voted on: Overall vote on the Government bill to repeal the objective dismissal for absence from work established in Article 52.d) of the consolidated text of the Workers' Statute, approved by Royal Legislative Decree 2/2015, of 23 October (originating from Royal Decree-Law 4/2020, of 18 February), given that it is processed in a single reading, taking into account the distributed technical corrections.

This law had 3 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 14 of sitting 29· updated 11 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Ciudadanos, Gcup-ec-gc and GPlu. Against, most of VOX. 6 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 33 most voted in favour; in 2, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 33
  • Against: 2
  • Abstained: 3
  • Tie: 14
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu5
5 in favour
Republicano13
13 in favour
Socialista120
117 in favour · 3 against
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)6
6 in favour
Mixto9
6 in favour · 3 abst.
Ciudadanos10
10 in favour
Gcup-ec-gc35
34 in favour · 1 did not vote
GPlu12
12 in favour
Popular en el Congreso88
88 abst.
VOX52
52 against

What happens next

What happens now?

It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.

The same initiative in the other chamber:

Published in the BOE: Law 1/2020, of July 15, repealing the objective dismissal for work absences established in Article 52.d) of the consolidated text of the Workers' Statute, approved by Royal Legislative Decree 2/2015, of October 23.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.