What it is
Dismissal for missed work days is eliminated
It is a government bill. Introduced by the Government. It was introduced on 25 March 2020. Introduced by: Gobierno.
Official title: Government bill repealing objective dismissal due to work absences established in Article 52.d) of the consolidated text of the Workers' Statute, approved by Royal Legislative Decree 2/2015, of October 23 (originating from Royal Decree-Law 4/2020, of February 18).
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000008· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The law eliminates the objective dismissal for missed work days, which allowed companies to dismiss workers whose absences, even justified ones, exceeded certain percentages.
- Until now, this dismissal was applied automatically once the absence percentages were reached, without checking whether it was appropriate and proportionate in each case.
- The Court of Justice of the European Union had ruled that this type of dismissal can discriminate based on disability, since people with disabilities or long-term illnesses may have more short medical leaves.
- It can also affect women more, since they mostly handle caregiving tasks, so it could amount to indirect discrimination based on sex.
- The law replaces royal decree-law A rule with the force of law that the Government passes because it is urgent. It applies from its publication, but the Congreso must validate it within 30 days or it lapses. 4/2020, of February 18, which had already removed this type of dismissal, and now does so with the rank of a law.
- The law takes effect the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette (Boletín Oficial del Estado).
Who it affects
- Workers: They can no longer be objectively dismissed for accumulating absences, including short medical leaves.
- People with disabilities or long-term illnesses: They are protected from a dismissal that could discriminate against them for having more medical absences.
- Companies: They lose this low-cost way of ending contracts; unjustified absences can still be punished through other means, such as disciplinary dismissal.
- Women with caregiving responsibilities: They avoid a dismissal risk that could penalize absences related to work-life balance.
Words worth knowing
- Despido objetivo (objective dismissal)
- A dismissal a company can decide for reasons set by law, paying compensation, without the worker having committed a serious breach.
- Derogar (repeal)
- To do away with a law or part of it.
- Discriminación indirecta (indirect discrimination)
- A situation where a seemingly neutral rule harms a specific group more, such as people with disabilities or women.
- Contingencias comunes (common contingencies)
- Medical leaves due to illness or accident not related to work.
- royal decree-law
- A rule with the force of law that the Government passes because it is urgent. It applies from its publication, but the Congreso must validate it within 30 days or it lapses.
- decree-law
- A rule with the force of law that the Government passes because it is urgent. It applies from its publication, but the Congreso must validate it within 30 days or it lapses.
It summarizes the law as published in the BOE. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.
- Introduced25 March 2020Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted30 March 2020The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments6 April 2020Groups propose changes.
- Committee12 May 2020A committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenary11 June 2020All 350 deputies vote.
- Senate17 June 2020The Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOE1 July 2020It is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 9 official steps on a timeline
17 June 2020
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Overall vote on the Government bill to repeal the objective dismissal for absence from work established in Article 52.d) of the consolidated text of the Workers' Statute, approved by Royal Legislative Decree 2/2015, of 23 October (originating from Royal Decree-Law 4/2020, of 18 February), given that it is processed in a single reading, taking into account the distributed technical corrections.
This law had 3 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 14 of sitting 29· updated 11 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Albacete More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 6 yes · 3 no · 3 abst.
- Almería Tie 2 yes · 2 no · 2 abst.
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Asturias More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Ávila Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Badajoz More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Barcelona More votes in favour 28 yes · 2 no · 2 abst.
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Burgos More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Cáceres More votes against 1 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Cádiz More votes in favour 5 yes · 2 no · 2 abst.
- Cantabria More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Ceuta More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Córdoba More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Cuenca More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Girona More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Granada More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Guadalajara Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Huelva More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Huesca More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Illes Balears More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no · 2 abst.
- Jaén More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- La Rioja More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Las Palmas More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- León More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Lleida More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Lugo More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Madrid More votes in favour 20 yes · 7 no · 10 abst.
- Málaga More votes in favour 6 yes · 2 no · 3 abst.
- Melilla Tie 0 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Murcia More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no · 3 abst.
- Navarra More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Ourense More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Palencia More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Pontevedra More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Salamanca Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no · 2 abst.
- Segovia Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Sevilla More votes in favour 7 yes · 3 no · 2 abst.
- Soria More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Tarragona More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Teruel More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Toledo Tie 2 yes · 2 no · 2 abst.
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 8 yes · 3 no · 4 abst.
- Valladolid More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Zamora Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Ciudadanos, Gcup-ec-gc and GPlu. Against, most of VOX. 6 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 33 most voted in favour; in 2, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 33
- Against: 2
- Abstained: 3
- Tie: 14
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Republicano | 13 | 13 in favour |
| Socialista | 120 | 117 in favour · 3 against |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 6 | 6 in favour |
| Mixto | 9 | 6 in favour · 3 abst. |
| Ciudadanos | 10 | 10 in favour |
| Gcup-ec-gc | 35 | 34 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| GPlu | 12 | 12 in favour |
| Popular en el Congreso | 88 | 88 abst. |
| VOX | 52 | 52 against |
What happens next
What happens now?
It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.
The same initiative in the other chamber:
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000008
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 14 of sitting 29
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- BOE, BOE-A-2020-7937
The law as published.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.