Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Proposed law to regulate euthanasia in Spain

Amendments step 3 of 7 · Unfinished

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 19 July 2019. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Socialista.

Official title: Private member's bill for an Organic Law regulating euthanasia.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000033· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would recognize the right of any person who meets the requirements to request and receive aid in dying, and defines two possible forms: a health professional directly administering a substance, or prescribing or supplying it so the patient can self-administer it.
  2. People with Spanish nationality or legal residence in Spain who are of legal age and suffer a serious and incurable illness, or a serious, chronic and disabling condition with intolerable suffering, could request the aid. Two written requests would be needed, at least fifteen calendar days apart, plus informed consent before receiving it.
  3. The procedure would include a deliberative process with the responsible physician, a second report from a consulting physician, and prior review by a Control and Evaluation Commission. The patient could withdraw the request or ask for a postponement at any time.
  4. The service would be included in the common portfolio of services of the National Health System, with public funding, and could be provided in public, private or contracted centers, or at the patient's home. Health professionals could refuse on grounds of conscientious objection, stating it in writing in advance.
  5. A Control and Evaluation Commission would be created in each autonomous community and in Ceuta and Melilla. It would handle appeals, verify that the service was provided according to the law, and publish an annual report.
  6. The bill would amend the Criminal Code so that a physician's conduct causing or cooperating in the death of a person in the established cases would not be punishable, and would provide that death resulting from aid in dying is considered a natural death for all purposes.

Who it affects

  • People with a serious and incurable illness or a serious, chronic and disabling condition: Could request and receive aid in dying if they meet the requirements.
  • Health professionals: Would carry out the service and could refuse on grounds of conscientious objection.
  • Public health services and private or contracted centers: Would have to guarantee access to the service and provide it in their facilities.
  • Autonomous communities and the cities of Ceuta and Melilla: Would have to create control and evaluation commissions.
  • Family members and close persons: Could submit the request on behalf of someone with de facto incapacity who left prior instructions.

Words worth knowing

Eutanasia (euthanasia)
Act of ending a person's life, at that person's express will, to spare them suffering.
Consentimiento informado (informed consent)
The patient's free, voluntary and conscious agreement after receiving adequate information.
Cuidados paliativos (palliative care)
Treatments that relieve physical or psychological suffering, even if they may hasten death.
Instrucciones previas (advance directives)
A document in which a person states in writing their wishes about future health care, in case they can no longer decide.
Objeción de conciencia sanitaria (conscientious objection in health care)
The individual right of health professionals to not perform health care actions that conflict with their beliefs.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 3 of 7 steps. It reached Amendments, and today it is unfinished.

  1. Introduced19 July 2019Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted25 July 2019The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendments20 September 2019Groups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 9 official steps on a timeline
Jul 2019Jul 2019Aug 2019Aug 2019Aug 2019Aug 2019Aug 2019Sept 2019Sept 2019Sept 201911. 19 July 2019: Presentación22. 25 July 2019: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 25/07/2019 hasta 30/07/201933. 25 July 2019: Calificación44. 30 July 2019: Gobierno Contestación desde 30/07/2019 hasta 30/08/201955. 30 August 2019: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 30/08/2019 hasta 10/09/201966. 10 September 2019: Mesa del Congreso Acuerdo subsiguiente a la toma en consideración desde 10/09/2019 hasta 17/09/201977. 17 September 2019: Comisión de Justicia Publicación desde 17/09/2019 hasta 20/09/201988. 20 September 2019: Comisión de Justicia Enmiendas desde 20/09/2019 hasta 24/09/201999. 24 September 2019: Concluido - (Caducado) desde 24/09/2019 hasta 23/10/2019

10 September 2019

How did the plenary vote?

More votes in favour 243 yes · 92 no · 2 abst.

Voted on: Private member's bill by the Socialist Parliamentary Group, Organic Law regulating euthanasia.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 6· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Ciudadanos and Gcup-ec-gc. Against, most of Popular and VOX. 4 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 45 most voted in favour; in 1, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 45
  • Against: 1
  • Tie: 6
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Republicano14
13 in favour · 1 abst.
Socialista123
120 in favour · 1 abst. · 2 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)6
6 in favour
Mixto18
9 in favour · 2 against · 7 did not vote
Ciudadanos56
56 in favour
Gcup-ec-gc42
39 in favour · 3 did not vote
Popular66
66 against
VOX24
24 against

What happens next

What happens now?

The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.

It was presented again:

Presented before in:

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.