Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

State fund to compensate asbestos victims

Committee step 4 of 7 · Unfinished

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 15 March 2017. Introduced by: Comunidad Autónoma del País Vasco - Parlamento.

Official title: Private member's bill for the creation of a compensation fund for victims of asbestos.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 125/000009· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would create the Fund for the Compensation of Asbestos Victims, a public agency attached to the social security ministry. It would pay compensation to anyone with a recognized occupational disease caused by asbestos, or anyone harmed by asbestos exposure in Spain.
  2. The fund would be financed by contributions from employers, payments from work accident mutual funds, and money from the state budget. The contribution base would be the same as for workplace accidents and unemployment, paid together with social security contributions.
  3. The fund would be run by a governing council with representatives of the administration, unions, employers and mutual funds, plus a general secretariat that decides compensation claims at first instance. Local administrative units would work within provincial social security offices, with a monitoring committee in each province.
  4. Claimants would file a request with a medical certificate and proof of asbestos exposure. If the disease is already recognized as occupational, the social security decision alone would suffice. The fund would have six months to make a compensation offer; accepting it means giving up any lawsuit over the same harm.
  5. Decisions could be appealed to the social security minister within one month, and then challenged before the administrative courts. Once compensation is paid, the fund steps into the victim's rights and pursues the parties responsible for the harm on its own.
  6. The explanatory statement justifies the fund because many companies where exposure occurred have disappeared by the time the disease shows up, decades later, and victims face costly lawsuits against social security and mutual funds without ever getting paid.

Who it affects

  • People with a recognized occupational disease caused by asbestos: They could ask the fund for full compensation for their losses.
  • People harmed by asbestos exposure in Spain, even outside work: They could also apply for compensation.
  • Public and private employers with employees: They would be required to contribute to the fund.
  • Work accident and occupational disease mutual funds: They would have to pay into the fund and could face claims from it after paying compensation.
  • Victims' family members: They could avoid costly lawsuits by accepting the fund's offer.

Words worth knowing

Organismo autónomo
A public agency with its own legal personality, created by the state to run a specific service.
Mutua de accidentes de trabajo
An entity that works with social security and manages benefits for workplace accidents and occupational diseases.
Subrogación (subrogation)
The fund takes the victim's place and itself claims the money from those responsible for the harm.
Recurso de alzada
A request for a higher authority to review a decision made by a lower one.
Jurisdicción contencioso-administrativa
The courts that review decisions made by public administrations.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 4 of 7 steps. It reached Committee, and today it is unfinished.

  1. Introduced15 March 2017Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted21 March 2017The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendments20 October 2017Groups propose changes.
  4. Committee3 October 2018A committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 11 official steps on a timeline
Mar 2017Jun 2017Sept 2017Dec 2017Mar 2018Jun 2018Sept 2018Dec 201811. 15 March 2017: Presentación22. 21 March 2017: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 21/03/2017 hasta 24/03/201733. 21 March 2017: Calificación44. 24 March 2017: Gobierno Contestación desde 24/03/2017 hasta 05/05/201755. 5 May 2017: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 05/05/2017 hasta 10/10/201766. 10 October 2017: Mesa del Congreso Acuerdo subsiguiente a la toma en consideración desde 10/10/2017 hasta 17/10/201777. 17 October 2017: Comisión de Empleo y Seguridad Social Publicación desde 17/10/2017 hasta 20/10/201788. 20 October 2017: Comisión de Empleo y Seguridad Social Enmiendas desde 20/10/2017 hasta 26/06/201899. 26 June 2018: Comisión de Trabajo, Migraciones y Seguridad Social Enmiendas desde 26/06/2018 hasta 03/10/20181010. 3 October 2018: Comisión de Trabajo, Migraciones y Seguridad Social Informe desde 03/10/2018 hasta 05/03/20191111. 5 March 2019: Concluido - (Caducado) desde 05/03/2019 hasta 27/03/2019

10 October 2017

How did the plenary vote?

More votes in favour 195 yes · 0 no · 127 abst.

Voted on: Private member's bill by the Basque Parliament, for the creation of a compensation fund for the victims of asbestos.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 76· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Ciudadanos and Gcup-ec-em.

By province: in 25 most voted in favour; in 0, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 25
  • Against: 0
  • Abstained: 11
  • Tie: 16
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista84
82 in favour · 2 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 in favour
Mixto19
11 in favour · 8 did not vote
Ciudadanos32
31 in favour · 1 did not vote
Gcup-ec-em67
66 in favour · 1 did not vote
GER9
9 did not vote
Popular en el Congreso134
127 abst. · 7 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.

It was presented again:

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.