What it is
Bill would ban HIV/AIDS discrimination in contracts and insurance
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 26 January 2017. Introduced by: Comunidad Foral de Navarra - Parlamento.
Official title: Private member's bill amending the consolidated text of the General Law for the Defense of Consumers and Users and other complementary laws, approved by Royal Legislative Decree 1/2007, of 16 November.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 125/000008· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would declare void any contract clauses that exclude a person for having HIV/AIDS or another health condition. Waiving this protection would also be void for the affected party.
- The initiative started with a proposal by the Parliament of Navarre and seeks to remove discriminatory clauses that, according to the text, increase the social stigma of people living with HIV.
- The bill would add a rule to the Insurance Contract Law banning discrimination based on HIV/AIDS or other health conditions. Insurers could not deny coverage, use different procedures from the usual ones, or impose costlier terms, unless based on justified, proportionate and documented reasons.
- The Government would have one year to present a bill extending these principles to other diseases. The law would take effect the day it is published in the Official State Gazette (Boletín Oficial del Estado).
Who it affects
- People with HIV/AIDS or other health conditions: They could not be excluded from contracts for that reason, and clauses that do so would be void.
- People buying insurance: Insurers could not deny them coverage or impose harsher terms for that reason, unless for justified and documented causes.
- Companies and insurers: They could not include clauses discriminating based on these health conditions.
Words worth knowing
- Nulidad (nullity)
- A clause has no legal value, as if it did not exist.
- Texto refundido (consolidated text)
- A single, organized version of a law that gathers all its amendments.
- Disposición final (final provision)
- The closing part of a law dealing with matters such as when it takes effect or changes to other laws.
It summarizes the drafting committee report. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.
- Introduced26 January 2017Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted31 January 2017The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments5 May 2017Groups propose changes.
- Committee27 September 2017A committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenaryno dateAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senate26 April 2018The Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOE6 June 2018It is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 13 official steps on a timeline
6 April 2017
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill from the Parliament of Navarre to amend the consolidated text of the General Law for the Defense of Consumers and Users and other complementary laws, approved by Royal Legislative Decree 1/2007, of November 16.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 45· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no
- Albacete More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 12 yes · 0 no
- Almería More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Asturias More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no
- Ávila More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Badajoz More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 29 yes · 0 no
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
- Burgos More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Cáceres More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 9 yes · 0 no
- Cantabria More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Córdoba More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Cuenca More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Girona More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Granada More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no
- Huelva More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Huesca More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Illes Balears More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
- Jaén More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- La Rioja More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Las Palmas More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
- León More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Lleida More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Lugo More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 33 yes · 0 no
- Málaga More votes in favour 10 yes · 0 no
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 10 yes · 0 no
- Navarra More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Ourense More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Pontevedra More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
- Segovia More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 12 yes · 0 no
- Soria More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Teruel More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Toledo More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 16 yes · 0 no
- Valladolid More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Ciudadanos, Gcup-ec-em, GER, Sin grupo and Popular en el Congreso.
By province: in 52 most voted in favour; in 0, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 52
- Against: 0
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 84 | 80 in favour · 4 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 4 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Mixto | 18 | 17 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Ciudadanos | 32 | 30 in favour · 2 did not vote |
| Gcup-ec-em | 67 | 65 in favour · 2 did not vote |
| GER | 9 | 9 in favour |
| Sin grupo | 1 | 1 in favour |
| Popular en el Congreso | 134 | 132 in favour · 2 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.
The same initiative in the other chamber:
- XII Legislature, Senate Private member's bill amending the consolidated text of the General Law for the Defense of Consumers and Users and other complementary laws, approved by Royal Legislative Decree 1/2007, of 16 November.
Presented before in:
- IX Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Unfinished Proposición de Ley por la que se modifica el Texto Refundido de la Ley General para la defensa de los consumidores y usuarios y otras leyes…
- X Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Rejected Bill to void clauses excluding people with HIV/AIDS
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 125/000008
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 45
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.