Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Bill to void clauses excluding people with HIV/AIDS

Admitted step 2 of 7 · Rejected

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 25 March 2013. Introduced by: Comunidad Foral de Navarra - Parlamento.

Official title: Private member's bill amending the consolidated text of the General Law for the Defense of Consumers and Users and other complementary laws, approved by Royal Legislative Decree 1/2007, of 16 November.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 125/000012· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would declare null and void any clauses, conditions or agreements that exclude one party for having HIV/AIDS. Such clauses would be treated as if they did not exist.
  2. The affected person could not validly waive this protection: that waiver would also be null.
  3. The bill would require the Spanish Government to submit, within one year, a bill extending these principles to other illnesses that produce the same excluding effects.
  4. If passed, the law would take effect the same day it is published in the Official State Gazette and would apply to new agreements and to existing ones still in force.

Who it affects

  • People with HIV/AIDS: They could no longer be excluded from services or benefits through discriminatory clauses.
  • Businesses and service providers: They could not include clauses excluding someone for having HIV/AIDS; such clauses would be null.
  • The Spanish Government: It would have to submit, within one year, a bill extending the protection to other illnesses.

Words worth knowing

Cláusula nula (null clause)
A term or condition in a contract that has no legal effect, as if it did not exist.
Texto refundido (consolidated text)
A single, organized version of a law that gathers several rules on the same subject into one text.
Proposición de ley (non-governmental bill)
A bill that is not introduced by the Government but by the Congress, the Senate, or a regional assembly.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced25 March 2013Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted2 April 2013The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 7 official steps on a timeline
Mar 2013Jun 2013Sept 2013Dec 2013Mar 201411. 25 March 2013: Presentación22. 2 April 2013: Mesa del Congreso Requerimiento de antecedentes desde 02/04/2013 hasta 22/04/201333. 2 April 2013: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 02/04/2013 hasta 05/04/201344. 2 April 2013: Calificación55. 5 April 2013: Gobierno Contestación desde 05/04/2013 hasta 14/05/201366. 14 May 2013: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 14/05/2013 hasta 06/05/201477. 6 May 2014: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 06/05/2014 hasta 03/06/2014

6 May 2014

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 153 yes · 169 no

Voted on: Private member's bill from the Parliament of Navarre to amend the consolidated text of the General Law for the Defense of Consumers and Users and other complementary laws, approved by Royal Legislative Decree 1/2007, of November 16.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 185· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU, GIP and GUPyD. Against, most of Popular en el Congreso.

By province: in 10 most voted in favour; in 34, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 10
  • Against: 34
  • Tie: 8
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista110
104 in favour · 6 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 in favour
Mixto18
15 in favour · 3 did not vote
GC-CiU16
13 in favour · 3 did not vote
GIP11
11 in favour
GUPyD5
5 in favour
Popular en el Congreso185
169 against · 16 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

It was presented again:

Presented before in:

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.