What it is
Bill to void clauses excluding people with HIV/AIDS
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 25 March 2013. Introduced by: Comunidad Foral de Navarra - Parlamento.
Official title: Private member's bill amending the consolidated text of the General Law for the Defense of Consumers and Users and other complementary laws, approved by Royal Legislative Decree 1/2007, of 16 November.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 125/000012· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would declare null and void any clauses, conditions or agreements that exclude one party for having HIV/AIDS. Such clauses would be treated as if they did not exist.
- The affected person could not validly waive this protection: that waiver would also be null.
- The bill would require the Spanish Government to submit, within one year, a bill extending these principles to other illnesses that produce the same excluding effects.
- If passed, the law would take effect the same day it is published in the Official State Gazette and would apply to new agreements and to existing ones still in force.
Who it affects
- People with HIV/AIDS: They could no longer be excluded from services or benefits through discriminatory clauses.
- Businesses and service providers: They could not include clauses excluding someone for having HIV/AIDS; such clauses would be null.
- The Spanish Government: It would have to submit, within one year, a bill extending the protection to other illnesses.
Words worth knowing
- Cláusula nula (null clause)
- A term or condition in a contract that has no legal effect, as if it did not exist.
- Texto refundido (consolidated text)
- A single, organized version of a law that gathers several rules on the same subject into one text.
- Proposición de ley (non-governmental bill)
- A bill that is not introduced by the Government but by the Congress, the Senate, or a regional assembly.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced25 March 2013Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted2 April 2013The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 7 official steps on a timeline
6 May 2014
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill from the Parliament of Navarre to amend the consolidated text of the General Law for the Defense of Consumers and Users and other complementary laws, approved by Royal Legislative Decree 1/2007, of November 16.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 185· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Albacete More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 4 yes · 8 no
- Almería More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Araba/Álava Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Asturias More votes in favour 5 yes · 3 no
- Ávila More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Badajoz More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 22 yes · 5 no
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 6 yes · 1 no
- Burgos More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Cantabria More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ceuta More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Ciudad Real More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Girona More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Granada More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Guadalajara More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Huelva More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Huesca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Illes Balears More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Jaén Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- La Rioja More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- León More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Lleida More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Lugo More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 16 yes · 14 no
- Málaga More votes against 4 yes · 6 no
- Melilla More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Murcia More votes against 2 yes · 8 no
- Navarra More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Ourense More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Palencia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Pontevedra Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Salamanca More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Segovia Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 7 yes · 4 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Teruel More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Toledo More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Valencia/València More votes against 6 yes · 8 no
- Valladolid More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Zamora More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Zaragoza Tie 3 yes · 3 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU, GIP and GUPyD. Against, most of Popular en el Congreso.
By province: in 10 most voted in favour; in 34, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 10
- Against: 34
- Tie: 8
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 110 | 104 in favour · 6 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Mixto | 18 | 15 in favour · 3 did not vote |
| GC-CiU | 16 | 13 in favour · 3 did not vote |
| GIP | 11 | 11 in favour |
| GUPyD | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Popular en el Congreso | 185 | 169 against · 16 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
It was presented again:
- XII Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Passed Bill would ban HIV/AIDS discrimination in contracts and insurance
- XII Legislature, Senate Private member's bill amending the consolidated text of the General Law for the Defense of Consumers and Users and other complementary laws, approved by Royal Legislative Decree 1/2007, of 16 November.
Presented before in:
- IX Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Unfinished Proposición de Ley por la que se modifica el Texto Refundido de la Ley General para la defensa de los consumidores y usuarios y otras leyes…
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 125/000012
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 185
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.