What it is
Bill to stop evictions, expand social rent and guarantee basic utilities
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 27 April 2018. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Confederal de Unidos Podemos-En Comú Podem-En Marea.
Official title: Private member's bill for a housing emergency law for vulnerable families in the housing field and energy poverty.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000234· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would impose a one-year moratorium on evictions from a primary home when the plaintiff is a large housing owner and the person is at risk of residential exclusion. It would also require a judge to weigh proportionality before ordering any eviction from a home.
- It would require large housing owners to offer social rent of at least five years before suing, at a price capped at 10%, 12% or 18% of income depending on income level. Failing to do so would carry fines of €100,000 to €500,000.
- For mortgages on a primary home, it would limit liability to the mortgaged property and wipe out the remaining debt through Dación en pago Handing the home over to the bank in exchange for canceling the mortgage debt. (handing over the home). It would also cancel debts of those who lost their home since 2006 and ban seizing the primary home of non-debtor guarantors.
- It would reform the Urban Leases Law to extend rental contracts to a minimum of five or ten years, cap prices at the INE reference index and limit rent increases between successive contracts.
- To grow the public housing stock, it would mandate the transfer of empty homes from large owners and from the SAREB, reserve land for public rental housing, set a 20% social housing goal for municipalities with proven demand, add a surcharge on the property tax of empty homes and ban selling the public housing stock.
- It would guarantee access to water, electricity and gas for vulnerable households: no utility shut-offs for non-payment in these cases, a social tariff and a minimum vital consumption, and companies would have to regularize service in homes without a contract, with penalties if they fail.
Who it affects
- Families at risk of residential exclusion who rent or have a mortgage: They would get eviction moratoriums, social rent, guaranteed rehousing and protected basic utilities.
- Large housing owners (banks, investment funds, and anyone with five apartments or over 800 m2): They would have to offer social rent, hand over empty homes and face fines if they fail.
- Non-debtor guarantors and co-signers: Their primary home could not be seized for someone else's debt.
- Tenants in general: They would get longer contracts, a deposit capped at one month and limits on rent increases.
- Water, electricity and gas companies: They could not cut service to vulnerable households and would have to apply the social tariff, with penalties otherwise.
Words worth knowing
- IPREM
- A yearly income threshold set by the Spanish State, used to calculate benefits and poverty limits.
- Dación en pago
- Handing the home over to the bank in exchange for canceling the mortgage debt.
- Gran tenedor de viviendas
- Large housing owner: banks, funds, or people owning five apartments or over 800 m2, as defined by the bill.
- Lanzamiento
- A court-ordered eviction from a home.
- Consumo Mínimo Vital
- A basic amount of water, electricity and gas guaranteed to every vulnerable household.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 4 of 7 steps. It reached Committee, and today it is unfinished.
- Introduced27 April 2018Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted3 May 2018The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments28 September 2018Groups propose changes.
- Committee20 December 2018A committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 12 official steps on a timeline
21 February 2019
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Vote on the amendment to the whole with alternative text to the Private Member's Bill on housing emergency for vulnerable families in the housing field and energy poverty, submitted by the Popular Parliamentary Group in the Congress.
This law had 2 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 36 of sitting 173· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Albacete Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 7 yes · 5 no
- Almería More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Araba/Álava More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Asturias Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Ávila More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Badajoz Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Barcelona More votes against 8 yes · 22 no
- Bizkaia More votes against 1 yes · 6 no
- Burgos Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes against 4 yes · 5 no
- Cantabria More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Girona More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Granada More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Huelva More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Huesca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Illes Balears More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Jaén Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- La Rioja More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Las Palmas More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- León Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Lleida More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Lugo More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 18 yes · 15 no
- Málaga More votes in favour 6 yes · 5 no
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 7 yes · 3 no
- Navarra More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Ourense More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Segovia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Sevilla Tie 6 yes · 6 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Teruel Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Toledo Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Valencia/València Tie 8 yes · 8 no
- Valladolid More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Ciudadanos and Popular en el Congreso. Against, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Gcup-ec-em and GER. 3 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 26 most voted in favour; in 13, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 26
- Against: 13
- Tie: 13
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 84 | 1 in favour · 81 against · 2 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 against |
| Mixto | 19 | 1 in favour · 17 against · 1 did not vote |
| Ciudadanos | 32 | 30 in favour · 2 did not vote |
| Gcup-ec-em | 67 | 1 in favour · 61 against · 5 did not vote |
| GER | 9 | 8 against · 1 did not vote |
| Popular en el Congreso | 134 | 131 in favour · 3 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.
It has not been presented again yet.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000234
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 36 of sitting 173
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.