What it is
Bill to equalize birth and adoption leave for both parents
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 27 April 2018. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Confederal de Unidos Podemos-En Comú Podem-En Marea.
Official title: Private member's bill on the reform of the system of permits and benefits for the care and attention of minors by their parents, in cases of birth, adoption, custody for adoption purposes or foster care.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000223· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would give each parent their own 16-week leave for birth, adoption, pre-adoption foster care or foster care, which could not be transferred or shared, with a benefit of 100% of the base rate.
- The leave would have two parts: an initial parental leave of two mandatory weeks right after the birth or adoption, and a parental leave for child care of fourteen weeks, four of them mandatory and ten voluntary, to be taken within 12 months.
- Equalization would be gradual: the other parent's leave would start at six weeks in 2017 and grow each year until reaching 16 weeks in 2022, when the new rules would fully apply.
- The bill would amend the Workers' Statute and the Basic Statute of Public Employees, so the equal leave would apply to both private-sector workers and civil servants.
- It would also regulate the Social Security benefit: who qualifies based on age and contributions, its amount of 100% of the base rate, and a non-contributory benefit of 42 days for those who have not contributed enough.
- The Government would have to run awareness campaigns, submit yearly statistics on leave use to the Cortes Generales, and a plan to make the right to a nursery school place universal when the leave ends.
Who it affects
- Workers who have a child by birth, adoption, pre-adoption foster care or foster care: They would get their own equal 16-week leave with a 100% benefit.
- Civil servants: The same 16-week leaves would apply to them under the Basic Statute of Public Employees.
- Biological mothers: They would keep their 16 weeks and could start the leave up to four weeks before delivery.
- Fathers and other non-biological parents: Their leave would be gradually extended until it equals the mother's in 2022.
- Families with a child with a disability, or with multiple births or adoptions: The leave would be extended by two additional weeks for each case.
Words worth knowing
- Base reguladora (base rate)
- The amount used to calculate a Social Security benefit, based on the worker's contributions.
- Guarda con fines de adopción (pre-adoption foster care)
- A measure by which a court or the administration places a minor with a family while the adoption is being processed.
- Acogimiento (foster care)
- A situation where a minor lives with a family other than their own, temporarily or permanently, without adoption.
- Prestación no contributiva (non-contributory benefit)
- Money paid by Social Security to people who have not contributed enough to qualify for the regular benefit.
- IPREM
- Indicador Público de Renta de Efectos Múltiples: a reference amount used to calculate some public benefits.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 4 of 7 steps. It reached Committee, and today it is unfinished.
- Introduced27 April 2018Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted3 May 2018The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments13 July 2018Groups propose changes.
- Committee27 February 2019A committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 10 official steps on a timeline
26 June 2018
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill by the Confederal Parliamentary Group of Unidos Podemos-En Comú Podem-En Marea, on the reform of the system of leave and benefits for the care and attention of minors by their parents, in cases of birth, adoption, custody for adoption or foster care.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 126· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no
- Albacete More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 12 yes · 0 no
- Almería More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Asturias More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no
- Ávila More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Badajoz More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 31 yes · 0 no
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no
- Burgos More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Cáceres More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no
- Cantabria More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Córdoba More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Cuenca More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Girona More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Granada More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Huelva More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Huesca More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Illes Balears More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no
- Jaén More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- La Rioja More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Las Palmas More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no
- León More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Lleida More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Lugo More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 34 yes · 0 no
- Málaga More votes in favour 11 yes · 0 no
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 9 yes · 0 no
- Navarra More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Ourense More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Pontevedra More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Segovia More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 12 yes · 0 no
- Soria More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Teruel More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Toledo More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 16 yes · 0 no
- Valladolid More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Ciudadanos, Gcup-ec-em, GER and Popular en el Congreso.
By province: in 52 most voted in favour; in 0, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 52
- Against: 0
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 83 | 82 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Mixto | 19 | 18 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Ciudadanos | 32 | 31 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Gcup-ec-em | 67 | 67 in favour |
| GER | 9 | 9 in favour |
| Popular en el Congreso | 134 | 130 in favour · 4 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.
It has not been presented again yet.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000223
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 126
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.