Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Bill to equalize birth and adoption leave for both parents

Committee step 4 of 7 · Unfinished

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 27 April 2018. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Confederal de Unidos Podemos-En Comú Podem-En Marea.

Official title: Private member's bill on the reform of the system of permits and benefits for the care and attention of minors by their parents, in cases of birth, adoption, custody for adoption purposes or foster care.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000223· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would give each parent their own 16-week leave for birth, adoption, pre-adoption foster care or foster care, which could not be transferred or shared, with a benefit of 100% of the base rate.
  2. The leave would have two parts: an initial parental leave of two mandatory weeks right after the birth or adoption, and a parental leave for child care of fourteen weeks, four of them mandatory and ten voluntary, to be taken within 12 months.
  3. Equalization would be gradual: the other parent's leave would start at six weeks in 2017 and grow each year until reaching 16 weeks in 2022, when the new rules would fully apply.
  4. The bill would amend the Workers' Statute and the Basic Statute of Public Employees, so the equal leave would apply to both private-sector workers and civil servants.
  5. It would also regulate the Social Security benefit: who qualifies based on age and contributions, its amount of 100% of the base rate, and a non-contributory benefit of 42 days for those who have not contributed enough.
  6. The Government would have to run awareness campaigns, submit yearly statistics on leave use to the Cortes Generales, and a plan to make the right to a nursery school place universal when the leave ends.

Who it affects

  • Workers who have a child by birth, adoption, pre-adoption foster care or foster care: They would get their own equal 16-week leave with a 100% benefit.
  • Civil servants: The same 16-week leaves would apply to them under the Basic Statute of Public Employees.
  • Biological mothers: They would keep their 16 weeks and could start the leave up to four weeks before delivery.
  • Fathers and other non-biological parents: Their leave would be gradually extended until it equals the mother's in 2022.
  • Families with a child with a disability, or with multiple births or adoptions: The leave would be extended by two additional weeks for each case.

Words worth knowing

Base reguladora (base rate)
The amount used to calculate a Social Security benefit, based on the worker's contributions.
Guarda con fines de adopción (pre-adoption foster care)
A measure by which a court or the administration places a minor with a family while the adoption is being processed.
Acogimiento (foster care)
A situation where a minor lives with a family other than their own, temporarily or permanently, without adoption.
Prestación no contributiva (non-contributory benefit)
Money paid by Social Security to people who have not contributed enough to qualify for the regular benefit.
IPREM
Indicador Público de Renta de Efectos Múltiples: a reference amount used to calculate some public benefits.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 4 of 7 steps. It reached Committee, and today it is unfinished.

  1. Introduced27 April 2018Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted3 May 2018The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendments13 July 2018Groups propose changes.
  4. Committee27 February 2019A committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 10 official steps on a timeline
Jun 2018Sept 2018Dec 201811. 27 April 2018: Presentación22. 3 May 2018: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 03/05/2018 hasta 07/05/201833. 3 May 2018: Calificación44. 7 May 2018: Gobierno Contestación desde 07/05/2018 hasta 13/06/201855. 13 June 2018: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 13/06/2018 hasta 26/06/201866. 26 June 2018: Mesa del Congreso Acuerdo subsiguiente a la toma en consideración desde 26/06/2018 hasta 10/07/201877. 10 July 2018: Comisión de Trabajo, Migraciones y Seguridad Social Publicación desde 10/07/2018 hasta 13/07/201888. 13 July 2018: Comisión de Trabajo, Migraciones y Seguridad Social Enmiendas desde 13/07/2018 hasta 27/02/201999. 27 February 2019: Comisión de Trabajo, Migraciones y Seguridad Social Informe desde 27/02/2019 hasta 05/03/20191010. 5 March 2019: Concluido - (Caducado) desde 05/03/2019 hasta 27/03/2019

26 June 2018

How did the plenary vote?

More votes in favour 342 yes · 0 no

Voted on: Private member's bill by the Confederal Parliamentary Group of Unidos Podemos-En Comú Podem-En Marea, on the reform of the system of leave and benefits for the care and attention of minors by their parents, in cases of birth, adoption, custody for adoption or foster care.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 126· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Ciudadanos, Gcup-ec-em, GER and Popular en el Congreso.

By province: in 52 most voted in favour; in 0, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 52
  • Against: 0
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista83
82 in favour · 1 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 in favour
Mixto19
18 in favour · 1 did not vote
Ciudadanos32
31 in favour · 1 did not vote
Gcup-ec-em67
67 in favour
GER9
9 in favour
Popular en el Congreso134
130 in favour · 4 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.

It has not been presented again yet.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.