What it is
Bill to regulate university internships at companies
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 18 July 2017. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Confederal de Unidos Podemos-En Comú Podem-En Marea.
Official title: Private member's bill regulating external university academic practices.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000121· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would make university external internships curricular only, meaning a course subject within the study plan, and would ban using them to replace paid job positions.
- It would require the company to pay the intern at least the minimum wage, proportional to internship hours, plus transportation and meal costs, and to register the student with Social Security.
- It would set hour and duration limits: a maximum of 5 hours a day or 25 a week during the teaching period, 500 total hours in undergraduate degrees, and a weekly rest of at least 48 hours. It would also cap the number of interns per company based on staff size.
- It would create an 'intern student statute' with rights such as two tutors (one from the university, one from the company), time off for exams or student representation without losing pay, and ownership of the intellectual property of their work.
- It would exclude from agreements companies convicted of crimes against workers, with final labor sanctions, that recently carried out collective layoffs, or that illegally seconded workers.
- It would penalize companies and universities that break the rules, create an Intern Observatory, and require the Government to publish yearly statistics on internships. The bill would repeal the current royal decrees on internships.
Who it affects
- University students doing external internships: They would get a minimum wage, limited hours, tutors and Social Security coverage.
- Companies and entities hosting interns: They would have to pay at least the minimum wage, respect hour and slot limits, and could be excluded or fined for violations.
- Universities and their tutor professors: They would have to manage and supervise internships, with a maximum of 20 students per tutor and academic year.
- Recent graduates: They would no longer be able to do the non-work internships regulated by Royal Decree 1543/2011, which the bill would repeal.
Words worth knowing
- Prácticas curriculares (curricular internships)
- Internships that are part of the study plan and count as a course subject, with a grade on the transcript.
- Convenio de Cooperación Educativa (educational cooperation agreement)
- A document signed by the university and the company setting out the internship: tasks, schedule, pay and conditions.
- Salario Mínimo Interprofesional (minimum wage)
- The lowest wage that can legally be paid to any worker in Spain.
- ECTS
- Credits that measure the workload of a university course in the European system.
- Jurisdicción social (social jurisdiction)
- The courts that handle labor and Social Security disputes.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 4 of 7 steps. It reached Committee, and today it is unfinished.
- Introduced18 July 2017Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted5 September 2017The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments11 December 2017Groups propose changes.
- Committee6 November 2018A committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 13 official steps on a timeline
22 November 2018
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Amendment in the form of an alternative text to the Private member's bill regulating external university academic practices, submitted by the Popular Parliamentary Group in the Congress.
This law had 2 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 14 of sitting 161· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Albacete Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 6 yes · 5 no · 1 abst.
- Almería Tie 2 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Araba/Álava More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Asturias Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Ávila More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Badajoz Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Barcelona More votes against 6 yes · 22 no · 2 abst.
- Bizkaia More votes against 1 yes · 7 no
- Burgos Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes against 4 yes · 5 no
- Cantabria Tie 2 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Córdoba More votes against 2 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Cuenca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Girona More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Granada Tie 3 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Huelva More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Huesca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Illes Balears More votes against 3 yes · 4 no · 1 abst.
- Jaén Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- La Rioja Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Las Palmas Tie 3 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- León Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Lleida More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Lugo Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 18 yes · 15 no · 3 abst.
- Málaga Tie 5 yes · 5 no · 1 abst.
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 6 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Navarra More votes against 0 yes · 3 no · 2 abst.
- Ourense More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Palencia Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife Tie 3 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Segovia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Sevilla More votes against 3 yes · 7 no · 1 abst.
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes against 1 yes · 4 no · 1 abst.
- Teruel More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Toledo Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Valencia/València More votes against 6 yes · 8 no · 2 abst.
- Valladolid Tie 2 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Zamora More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Popular en el Congreso. Against, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Gcup-ec-em and GER. 14 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 16 most voted in favour; in 16, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 16
- Against: 16
- Tie: 20
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 84 | 84 against |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 4 against · 1 did not vote |
| Mixto | 19 | 1 in favour · 13 against · 2 abst. · 3 did not vote |
| Ciudadanos | 32 | 11 in favour · 21 abst. |
| Gcup-ec-em | 67 | 65 against · 2 did not vote |
| GER | 9 | 9 against |
| Popular en el Congreso | 134 | 131 in favour · 3 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.
It has not been presented again yet.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000121
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 14 of sitting 161
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.