Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Bill to regulate university internships at companies

Committee step 4 of 7 · Unfinished

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 18 July 2017. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Confederal de Unidos Podemos-En Comú Podem-En Marea.

Official title: Private member's bill regulating external university academic practices.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000121· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would make university external internships curricular only, meaning a course subject within the study plan, and would ban using them to replace paid job positions.
  2. It would require the company to pay the intern at least the minimum wage, proportional to internship hours, plus transportation and meal costs, and to register the student with Social Security.
  3. It would set hour and duration limits: a maximum of 5 hours a day or 25 a week during the teaching period, 500 total hours in undergraduate degrees, and a weekly rest of at least 48 hours. It would also cap the number of interns per company based on staff size.
  4. It would create an 'intern student statute' with rights such as two tutors (one from the university, one from the company), time off for exams or student representation without losing pay, and ownership of the intellectual property of their work.
  5. It would exclude from agreements companies convicted of crimes against workers, with final labor sanctions, that recently carried out collective layoffs, or that illegally seconded workers.
  6. It would penalize companies and universities that break the rules, create an Intern Observatory, and require the Government to publish yearly statistics on internships. The bill would repeal the current royal decrees on internships.

Who it affects

  • University students doing external internships: They would get a minimum wage, limited hours, tutors and Social Security coverage.
  • Companies and entities hosting interns: They would have to pay at least the minimum wage, respect hour and slot limits, and could be excluded or fined for violations.
  • Universities and their tutor professors: They would have to manage and supervise internships, with a maximum of 20 students per tutor and academic year.
  • Recent graduates: They would no longer be able to do the non-work internships regulated by Royal Decree 1543/2011, which the bill would repeal.

Words worth knowing

Prácticas curriculares (curricular internships)
Internships that are part of the study plan and count as a course subject, with a grade on the transcript.
Convenio de Cooperación Educativa (educational cooperation agreement)
A document signed by the university and the company setting out the internship: tasks, schedule, pay and conditions.
Salario Mínimo Interprofesional (minimum wage)
The lowest wage that can legally be paid to any worker in Spain.
ECTS
Credits that measure the workload of a university course in the European system.
Jurisdicción social (social jurisdiction)
The courts that handle labor and Social Security disputes.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 4 of 7 steps. It reached Committee, and today it is unfinished.

  1. Introduced18 July 2017Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted5 September 2017The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendments11 December 2017Groups propose changes.
  4. Committee6 November 2018A committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 13 official steps on a timeline
Sept 2017Dec 2017Mar 2018Jun 2018Sept 2018Dec 201811. 18 July 2017: Presentación22. 5 September 2017: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 05/09/2017 hasta 08/09/201733. 5 September 2017: Calificación44. 8 September 2017: Gobierno Contestación desde 08/09/2017 hasta 16/10/201755. 16 October 2017: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 16/10/2017 hasta 30/11/201766. 30 November 2017: Mesa del Congreso Acuerdo subsiguiente a la toma en consideración desde 30/11/2017 hasta 05/12/201777. 5 December 2017: Comisión de Educación y Deporte Publicación desde 05/12/2017 hasta 11/12/201788. 11 December 2017: Comisión de Educación y Deporte Enmiendas desde 11/12/2017 hasta 26/06/201899. 26 June 2018: Comisión de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades Enmiendas desde 26/06/2018 hasta 27/02/20191010. 31 October 2018: Comisión de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades Mesa - Calificación desde 31/10/2018 hasta 06/11/20181111. 6 November 2018: Comisión de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades Debate de totalidad desde 06/11/2018 hasta 22/11/20181212. 27 February 2019: Comisión de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades Informe desde 27/02/2019 hasta 05/03/20191313. 5 March 2019: Concluido - (Caducado) desde 05/03/2019 hasta 27/03/2019

22 November 2018

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 143 yes · 175 no · 23 abst.

Voted on: Amendment in the form of an alternative text to the Private member's bill regulating external university academic practices, submitted by the Popular Parliamentary Group in the Congress.

This law had 2 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 14 of sitting 161· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Popular en el Congreso. Against, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Gcup-ec-em and GER. 14 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 16 most voted in favour; in 16, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 16
  • Against: 16
  • Tie: 20
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista84
84 against
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
4 against · 1 did not vote
Mixto19
1 in favour · 13 against · 2 abst. · 3 did not vote
Ciudadanos32
11 in favour · 21 abst.
Gcup-ec-em67
65 against · 2 did not vote
GER9
9 against
Popular en el Congreso134
131 in favour · 3 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.

It has not been presented again yet.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.