What it is
Bill would let a caretaker government set deficit targets
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 30 September 2016. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Popular en el Congreso.
Official title: Private member's bill for an Organic Law reforming Organic Law 2/2012, of April 27, on Budgetary Stability and Financial Sustainability.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000036· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would add a seventh additional provision to organic law A law on fundamental rights, the electoral system or other matters the Constitution reserves. It needs an absolute majority in the Congreso: 176 votes. 2/2012 so that a caretaker government can revise budget stability and public debt targets when required by a European Union decision.
- In that case, the caretaker government's agreement would not include the non-financial spending ceiling of the State Budget, because a caretaker government cannot approve a draft State Budget law.
- The preamble explains the reason: the Council of the European Union revised the deficit targets for 2016, 2017 and 2018 in August 2016, and the Spanish targets needed to be adjusted to that new decision.
- It would amend the fifth additional provision of the Corporate income tax The personal income tax (IRPF in Spain): what people pay on what they earn from work, business or savings. Law to adjust how the Canary Islands special economic regime and the Ceuta and Melilla allowance affect installment tax payments, effective for tax periods starting January 1, 2016.
- It would authorize ADIF and SEPES to formalize guarantees through letters of conformity or sponsorship in favor of Bilbao Ría 2000, and to take on multi-year commitments and contributions to that entity. It would also allow the Government to authorize similar guarantees for Renfe Operadora, ADIF Alta Velocidad and ADIF.
- The first two final provisions would be passed as ordinary law, not as an organic law.
- The rule would enter into force on the same day it is published in the Official State Gazette.
- Many amendments were filed during the process, such as letting the Cortes propose and approve the targets if they reject the Government's, distributing the deficit according to each administration's spending, or deleting the spending rule, but the approved text is limited to the points above.
Who it affects
- The Government and the parties represented in the Congress of Deputies (Congreso de los Diputados).: A caretaker government could set deficit and debt targets without including the State Budget spending ceiling.
- Companies paying Corporate Income Tax that operate in the Canary Islands, Ceuta or Melilla.: The rules for calculating their installment tax payments change.
- ADIF, SEPES, Renfe Operadora, ADIF Alta Velocidad and Bilbao Ría 2000.: They are authorized to sign guarantees and financial commitments with banks.
- The general public.: Public administrations' deficit and debt targets can be revised even without a full government.
Words worth knowing
- Gobierno en funciones (caretaker government)
- A government that stays in office on a limited basis after elections, until a new one is formed.
- Estabilidad presupuestaria (budget stability)
- A rule limiting how much public administrations can overspend, that is, how much deficit they can run.
- Límite de gasto no financiero (non-financial spending ceiling)
- The maximum spending cap the State sets when preparing its Budget.
- Cartas de conformidad o de patrocinio (comfort letters)
- Documents with which a public entity backs a credit transaction requested by another company.
- Pagos fraccionados (installment payments)
- Advance payments of Corporate Income Tax that companies make during the year.
- organic law
- A law on fundamental rights, the electoral system or other matters the Constitution reserves. It needs an absolute majority in the Congreso: 176 votes.
- income tax
- The personal income tax (IRPF in Spain): what people pay on what they earn from work, business or savings.
It summarizes the text passed by the full Congreso. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.
- Introduced30 September 2016Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted4 October 2016The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments18 October 2016Groups propose changes.
- Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenary19 October 2016All 350 deputies vote.
- Senate20 October 2016The Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOE25 October 2016It is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 9 official steps on a timeline
20 October 2016
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Overall vote on the Private member's bill for an Organic Law reforming Organic Law 2/2012, of April 27, on Budgetary Stability and Financial Sustainability, processed in a single reading and having organic character, with the distributed technical corrections.
This law had 24 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 22 of sitting 9· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes in favour 6 yes · 2 no
- Albacete More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 9 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Almería More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Asturias More votes in favour 5 yes · 2 no
- Ávila More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Badajoz More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no
- Barcelona More votes against 13 yes · 18 no
- Bizkaia Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Burgos More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Cáceres More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 7 yes · 2 no
- Cantabria More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Córdoba More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no
- Cuenca More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Gipuzkoa Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Girona More votes against 1 yes · 5 no
- Granada More votes in favour 6 yes · 1 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Huelva More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Huesca More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no
- Illes Balears More votes in favour 6 yes · 2 no
- Jaén More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- La Rioja More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Las Palmas More votes in favour 5 yes · 2 no
- León More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Lleida More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Lugo More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 27 yes · 8 no
- Málaga More votes in favour 9 yes · 2 no
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 9 yes · 1 no
- Navarra More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Ourense More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Pontevedra More votes in favour 5 yes · 2 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 6 yes · 1 no
- Segovia More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 8 yes · 3 no
- Soria More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no
- Tarragona Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Teruel More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Toledo More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 10 yes · 3 no · 2 abst.
- Valladolid More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 6 yes · 1 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Ciudadanos and Popular en el Congreso. Against, most of Mixto, Gcup-ec-em and GER. 9 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 46 most voted in favour; in 3, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 46
- Against: 3
- Tie: 3
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 84 | 80 in favour · 4 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Mixto | 19 | 5 in favour · 10 against · 4 abst. |
| Ciudadanos | 32 | 32 in favour |
| Gcup-ec-em | 67 | 66 against · 1 did not vote |
| GER | 9 | 9 against |
| Popular en el Congreso | 134 | 133 in favour · 1 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.
It was presented again:
- XIII Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Unfinished Proposal to change how budget stability targets are approved
- XIV Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Unfinished Proposal to change how budget stability targets are approved
The same initiative in the other chamber:
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000036
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 22 of sitting 9
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.