What it is
Proposal to let Spanish courts try international crimes with no limits
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 29 July 2016. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario de Esquerra Republicana.
Official title: Private member's organic bill amending Organic Law 6/1985, of July 1, on the Judiciary, regarding the improvement of universal jurisdiction.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000008· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would allow Spanish courts to try international crimes committed outside Spain, regardless of the nationality of the perpetrators or the victims and of where the acts took place. Its sponsors argue that the 2009 and 2014 reforms severely limited this power, known as universal jurisdiction.
- It would amend Article 23 of the organic law A law on fundamental rights, the electoral system or other matters the Constitution reserves. It needs an absolute majority in the Congreso: 176 votes. on the Judiciary so that Spanish courts could hear cases of crimes such as genocide, terrorism, torture, piracy, human trafficking or forced disappearance committed outside Spain, among others. It would also cover crimes committed by Spaniards or by foreigners who acquired Spanish nationality after the acts.
- It would delete paragraph 6 of Article 23, which contained the restrictions introduced by the earlier reforms. This would remove the requirement of a link to Spain in order to investigate these crimes.
- The law would take effect the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette (Boletín Oficial del Estado), and any conflicting provisions would be repealed.
Who it affects
- Victims of international crimes committed outside Spain, who could file complaints with Spanish courts even without a link to Spain.: They could turn to Spanish justice along with the Public Prosecutor's Office.
- People suspected of genocide, terrorism, torture, trafficking or other serious crimes, whether Spanish or foreign.: They could be investigated and tried in Spain even if the acts happened abroad and they had no connection to the country.
- Spanish judges and courts.: They would regain the power to investigate these crimes without the 2009 and 2014 restrictions.
- The Public Prosecutor's Office and private accusers.: They could file criminal complaints in these cases, since the bill does not exclude anyone from bringing charges.
Words worth knowing
- Justicia universal (universal jurisdiction)
- A principle that lets a country's courts try very serious crimes committed anywhere in the world, even when neither the victims nor those responsible have any link to that country.
- Jurisdicción (jurisdiction)
- The power of judges and courts to hear and decide a case.
- Ley Orgánica (Organic Law)
- A special type of Spanish law, reserved for important matters, that requires an absolute majority of members of Congress to pass.
- Proposición de ley (bill)
- A text through which a parliamentary group proposes a law. It is not an approved law until the full legislative process is complete.
- Querella (criminal complaint)
- A written filing by which a person asks a judge to open a criminal case for an offense.
- organic law
- A law on fundamental rights, the electoral system or other matters the Constitution reserves. It needs an absolute majority in the Congreso: 176 votes.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 4 of 7 steps. It reached Committee, and today it is unfinished.
- Introduced29 July 2016Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted6 September 2016The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments7 March 2017Groups propose changes.
- Committee6 March 2018A committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 12 official steps on a timeline
15 March 2018
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Amendment to the whole of the alternative text to the Private Member's Organic Bill amending Organic Law 6/1985, of 1 July, of the Judicial Power, regarding the improvement of universal jurisdiction, submitted by the Popular Parliamentary Group in the Congress.
This law had 2 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 105· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Albacete Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Alicante/Alacant Tie 5 yes · 5 no · 2 abst.
- Almería More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Araba/Álava More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Asturias More votes against 3 yes · 4 no · 1 abst.
- Ávila More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Badajoz Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Barcelona More votes against 3 yes · 23 no · 4 abst.
- Bizkaia More votes against 1 yes · 7 no
- Burgos Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes against 3 yes · 5 no · 1 abst.
- Cantabria Tie 2 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Castellón/Castelló Tie 2 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Córdoba More votes against 2 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Cuenca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Girona More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Granada Tie 3 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Huelva More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Huesca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Illes Balears More votes against 3 yes · 4 no · 1 abst.
- Jaén More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- La Rioja Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 3 yes · 4 no · 1 abst.
- León Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Lleida More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Lugo Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Madrid Tie 15 yes · 15 no · 6 abst.
- Málaga More votes against 4 yes · 5 no · 2 abst.
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 5 yes · 3 no · 2 abst.
- Navarra More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ourense More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife Tie 3 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Segovia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Sevilla More votes against 4 yes · 7 no · 1 abst.
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes against 1 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Teruel More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Toledo Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Valencia/València More votes against 6 yes · 8 no · 2 abst.
- Valladolid Tie 2 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Zamora More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Zaragoza Tie 3 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Popular en el Congreso. Against, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Gcup-ec-em and GER. 3 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 14 most voted in favour; in 20, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 14
- Against: 20
- Tie: 18
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 84 | 84 against |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 against |
| Mixto | 19 | 3 in favour · 14 against · 2 did not vote |
| Ciudadanos | 32 | 32 abst. |
| Gcup-ec-em | 67 | 67 against |
| GER | 9 | 9 against |
| Popular en el Congreso | 134 | 132 in favour · 2 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.
It has not been presented again yet.
Presented before in:
- XI Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Withdrawn Proposal to let Spanish courts try international crimes without limits
- XI Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Unfinished Proposal to let Spanish courts try international crimes without limits
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000008
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 105
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.