Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Proposal to let Spanish courts try international crimes with no limits

Committee step 4 of 7 · Unfinished

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 29 July 2016. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario de Esquerra Republicana.

Official title: Private member's organic bill amending Organic Law 6/1985, of July 1, on the Judiciary, regarding the improvement of universal jurisdiction.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000008· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would allow Spanish courts to try international crimes committed outside Spain, regardless of the nationality of the perpetrators or the victims and of where the acts took place. Its sponsors argue that the 2009 and 2014 reforms severely limited this power, known as universal jurisdiction.
  2. It would amend Article 23 of the organic law A law on fundamental rights, the electoral system or other matters the Constitution reserves. It needs an absolute majority in the Congreso: 176 votes. on the Judiciary so that Spanish courts could hear cases of crimes such as genocide, terrorism, torture, piracy, human trafficking or forced disappearance committed outside Spain, among others. It would also cover crimes committed by Spaniards or by foreigners who acquired Spanish nationality after the acts.
  3. It would delete paragraph 6 of Article 23, which contained the restrictions introduced by the earlier reforms. This would remove the requirement of a link to Spain in order to investigate these crimes.
  4. The law would take effect the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette (Boletín Oficial del Estado), and any conflicting provisions would be repealed.

Who it affects

  • Victims of international crimes committed outside Spain, who could file complaints with Spanish courts even without a link to Spain.: They could turn to Spanish justice along with the Public Prosecutor's Office.
  • People suspected of genocide, terrorism, torture, trafficking or other serious crimes, whether Spanish or foreign.: They could be investigated and tried in Spain even if the acts happened abroad and they had no connection to the country.
  • Spanish judges and courts.: They would regain the power to investigate these crimes without the 2009 and 2014 restrictions.
  • The Public Prosecutor's Office and private accusers.: They could file criminal complaints in these cases, since the bill does not exclude anyone from bringing charges.

Words worth knowing

Justicia universal (universal jurisdiction)
A principle that lets a country's courts try very serious crimes committed anywhere in the world, even when neither the victims nor those responsible have any link to that country.
Jurisdicción (jurisdiction)
The power of judges and courts to hear and decide a case.
Ley Orgánica (Organic Law)
A special type of Spanish law, reserved for important matters, that requires an absolute majority of members of Congress to pass.
Proposición de ley (bill)
A text through which a parliamentary group proposes a law. It is not an approved law until the full legislative process is complete.
Querella (criminal complaint)
A written filing by which a person asks a judge to open a criminal case for an offense.
organic law
A law on fundamental rights, the electoral system or other matters the Constitution reserves. It needs an absolute majority in the Congreso: 176 votes.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 4 of 7 steps. It reached Committee, and today it is unfinished.

  1. Introduced29 July 2016Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted6 September 2016The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendments7 March 2017Groups propose changes.
  4. Committee6 March 2018A committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 12 official steps on a timeline
Sept 2016Dec 2016Mar 2017Jun 2017Sept 2017Dec 2017Mar 2018Jun 2018Sept 2018Dec 201811. 29 July 2016: Presentación22. 6 September 2016: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 06/09/2016 hasta 09/09/201633. 6 September 2016: Calificación44. 9 September 2016: Gobierno Contestación desde 09/09/2016 hasta 17/10/201655. 17 October 2016: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 17/10/2016 hasta 21/02/201766. 21 February 2017: Mesa del Congreso Acuerdo subsiguiente a la toma en consideración desde 21/02/2017 hasta 28/02/201777. 28 February 2017: Comisión de Justicia Publicación desde 28/02/2017 hasta 07/03/201788. 7 March 2017: Comisión de Justicia Enmiendas desde 07/03/2017 hasta 31/10/201899. 28 February 2018: Comisión de Justicia Mesa - Calificación desde 28/02/2018 hasta 06/03/20181010. 6 March 2018: Comisión de Justicia Debate de totalidad desde 06/03/2018 hasta 15/03/20181111. 31 October 2018: Comisión de Justicia Informe desde 31/10/2018 hasta 05/03/20191212. 5 March 2019: Concluido - (Caducado) desde 05/03/2019 hasta 27/03/2019

15 March 2018

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 135 yes · 179 no · 32 abst.

Voted on: Amendment to the whole of the alternative text to the Private Member's Organic Bill amending Organic Law 6/1985, of 1 July, of the Judicial Power, regarding the improvement of universal jurisdiction, submitted by the Popular Parliamentary Group in the Congress.

This law had 2 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 105· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Popular en el Congreso. Against, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Gcup-ec-em and GER. 3 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 14 most voted in favour; in 20, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 14
  • Against: 20
  • Tie: 18
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista84
84 against
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 against
Mixto19
3 in favour · 14 against · 2 did not vote
Ciudadanos32
32 abst.
Gcup-ec-em67
67 against
GER9
9 against
Popular en el Congreso134
132 in favour · 2 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.

It has not been presented again yet.

Presented before in:

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.