What it is

Request for the creation of an Investigating Committee on the Angrois railway accident.

Plenary step 5 of 7 · Rejected

It is a request to create a committee of inquiry. It was introduced on 25 February 2016. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Podemos-En Comú Podem-En Marea Grupo Parlamentario Mixto.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 156/000001· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 5 of 7 steps. It reached Plenary, and today it is rejected.

Introduced25 February 2016Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
Admitted29 February 2016The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
Plenary19 April 2016The deputies vote, usually in the plenary; some laws are passed by a committee without going to it.
Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
BOEnot reachedThe King gives royal assent and it is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE). It comes into force on the date it sets, or after 20 days if it sets none.

See the 5 official steps on a timeline

28 April 2016

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 132 yes · 199 no · 1 abst.

Voted on: Request, formulated by the Parliamentary Groups Podemos-En Comú Podem-En Marea and Mixed, for the creation of an Investigating Committee regarding the Angrois railway accident.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 13· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted

More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Ciudadanos, Gc-dl, GER and Gp-ec-em. Against, most of Socialista and Popular en el Congreso. 4 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 6 most voted in favour; in 45, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

In favour: 6
Against: 45
Tie: 1

Result by parliamentary group
Group	Seats	How it voted
Socialista	89	86 against · 1 abst. · 2 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)	6	5 in favour · 1 did not vote
Mixto	14	7 in favour · 3 against · 4 did not vote
Ciudadanos	40	39 in favour · 1 did not vote
Gc-dl	8	7 in favour · 1 did not vote
GER	9	9 in favour
Gp-ec-em	65	65 in favour
Popular en el Congreso	118	110 against · 8 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

Congreso de los Diputados, file 156/000001
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.

Retrieved 11 November 2026
Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 13
The count and every seat’s vote.

Retrieved 10 November 2026

The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.

Read the full method · Report an error

Request for the creation of an Investigating Committee on the Angrois railway accident. Automatic translation · See the Spanish original