Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Proposal for the reform of the first additional provision of the Statute of Autonomy of the Valencian Community (corresponds to file numbers 127/000003/0000 of the IX Legislature and 127/000001/0000 of the X Legislature).

Plenary step 5 of 7 · Unfinished

It is a reform of a regional statute. Changes a region’s statute of autonomy. It was introduced on 13 January 2016. Introduced by: Comunitat Valenciana - Les Corts.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 127/000001· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 5 of 7 steps. It reached Plenary, and today it is unfinished.

  1. Introduced13 January 2016Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted2 February 2016The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendments15 April 2016Groups propose changes.
  4. Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenary9 February 2016The deputies vote, usually in the plenary; some laws are passed by a committee without going to it.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedThe King gives royal assent and it is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE). It comes into force on the date it sets, or after 20 days if it sets none.
See the 8 official steps on a timeline
Jan 2016Feb 2016Mar 2016Apr 201611. 13 January 2016: Presentación22. 2 February 2016: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 02/02/2016 hasta 09/02/201633. 2 February 2016: Calificación44. 9 February 2016: Pleno Debate de totalidad desde 09/02/2016 hasta 05/04/201655. 5 April 2016: Mesa del Congreso Acuerdo subsiguiente a votación favorable en debate totalidad desde 05/04/2016 hasta 12/04/201666. 12 April 2016: Comisión Constitucional Publicación desde 12/04/2016 hasta 15/04/201677. 15 April 2016: Comisión Constitucional Enmiendas desde 15/04/2016 hasta 03/05/201688. 3 May 2016: Concluido - (Trasladado al próximo Congreso) desde 03/05/2016 hasta 20/05/2016

5 April 2016

How did the plenary vote?

More votes in favour 290 yes · 0 no · 44 abst.

Voted on: Proposal to reform the first additional provision of the Statute of Autonomy of the Valencian Community.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 6· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Socialista, Mixto, Gc-dl, GER, Gp-ec-em and Popular en el Congreso. 1 deputy voted differently from their group.

By province: in 52 most voted in favour; in 0, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 52
  • Against: 0
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista89
88 in favour · 1 abst.
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)6
5 abst. · 1 did not vote
Mixto14
10 in favour · 4 did not vote
Ciudadanos40
38 abst. · 2 did not vote
Gc-dl8
8 in favour
GER9
9 in favour
Gp-ec-em65
64 in favour · 1 did not vote
Popular en el Congreso119
111 in favour · 8 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.

It has not been presented again yet.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.