What it is
Opening rail passenger service to competition and reorganizing RENFE and FEVE
It is a royal decree-law. It was introduced on 20 July 2012. Introduced by: Gobierno.
Official title: Royal Decree-Law 22/2012, of 20 July, adopting measures in the field of railway infrastructure and services.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 130/000023· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- RENFE-Operadora will be reorganized into four state-owned trading companies, all owned by RENFE-Operadora, covering passengers; freight and logistics; manufacturing and maintenance; and rail asset management. The Council of Ministers must authorize their creation.
- The public entity FEVE is abolished on December 31, 2012. Its assets, rights, obligations and workers are split between ADIF and RENFE-Operadora, depending on whether they are attached to infrastructure or to running rail services.
- The liberalization of rail passenger transport on the general interest network is moved forward: the market opens on July 31, 2013, earlier than planned in the Rail Sector Law.
- Regional governments that already had commuter and regional services transferred to them may arrange for those services to be provided.
- Before December 31, 2012, the Ministry of Public Works must send the Council of Ministers a proposal on rail infrastructure that is not profitable and on medium-distance services that are not public service obligations.
- Two sections built by the State are assigned to ADIF: the Mediterranean corridor connection (Vandellós-Tarragona Area) and the A Coruña-Vigo section of the Atlantic high-speed axis. In addition, the number of public sector companies and foundations under the Ministry of Public Works is to be reduced.
Who it affects
- RENFE-Operadora and its workers: It is reorganized into four companies and its staff move into them, with no increase in pay or staffing costs.
- FEVE workers: They join ADIF or RENFE-Operadora, keeping the collective agreements in force.
- Rail passengers: From July 31, 2013, several companies will compete in rail passenger transport.
- Regional governments with transferred commuter and regional services: They may arrange for those transport services to be provided.
Words worth knowing
- Entidad pública empresarial
- A public organization that provides services like a company, but belongs to the State.
- Liberalización
- Liberalization: opening a service to competition so it is not provided by a single company.
- Red ferroviaria de interés general (RFIG)
- The State-wide rail network, connecting different parts of Spain, as opposed to local or regional networks.
- Subrogarse
- To step into another entity's place, taking over its rights and obligations.
- Obligación de servicio público
- Public service obligation: a service the government requires to be maintained even if it is not profitable, such as some medium-distance trains.
It summarizes the law as published in the BOE. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.
- Introduced20 July 2012Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted24 July 2012The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
- Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenary24 July 2012All 350 deputies vote.
- Senateno dateThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEno dateIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 4 official steps on a timeline
24 July 2012
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Processing as a Government bill by the urgent procedure of Royal Decree-Law 22/2012, of 20 July, adopting measures in the field of railway infrastructure and services.
This law had 2 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 3 of sitting 50· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 2 yes · 5 no
- Albacete More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 4 yes · 7 no
- Almería More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Asturias More votes in favour 5 yes · 3 no
- Ávila More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Badajoz More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 17 yes · 6 no
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no
- Burgos More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Cantabria More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Castellón/Castelló Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Ceuta More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Ciudad Real More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Girona More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Granada More votes against 2 yes · 5 no
- Guadalajara More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Huelva More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Huesca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Illes Balears More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Jaén Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- La Rioja More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- León More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Lleida More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Lugo More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Madrid More votes against 15 yes · 17 no
- Málaga More votes against 4 yes · 5 no
- Melilla More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Murcia More votes against 2 yes · 8 no
- Navarra More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Ourense More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Palencia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Salamanca More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Segovia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 6 yes · 4 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Teruel More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Toledo More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Valencia/València More votes against 6 yes · 9 no
- Valladolid Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Zamora More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU, GIP and GUPyD. Against, most of Popular en el Congreso. 2 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 9 most voted in favour; in 37, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 9
- Against: 37
- Tie: 6
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 110 | 102 in favour · 1 against · 7 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Mixto | 18 | 6 in favour · 1 against · 11 did not vote |
| GC-CiU | 16 | 14 in favour · 2 did not vote |
| GIP | 11 | 8 in favour · 3 did not vote |
| GUPyD | 5 | 4 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Popular en el Congreso | 185 | 175 against · 10 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.
Published in the BOE: Royal Decree-Law 22/2012, of July 20, adopting measures in the field of railway infrastructure and services.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 130/000023
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 3 of sitting 50
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- BOE, BOE-A-2012-9772
The law as published.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.