What it is
New rules on who gets public healthcare and how much they pay
It is a royal decree-law. It was introduced on 24 April 2012. Introduced by: Gobierno.
Official title: Royal Decree-Law 16/2012, of April 20, on urgent measures to guarantee the sustainability of the National Health System and improve the quality and safety of its services.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 130/000017· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- Public healthcare becomes tied to insured status: Social Security workers and pensioners, people receiving benefits such as unemployment benefits, and those who have used up those benefits and are registered as job seekers. Their relatives living in Spain (spouse, former spouse they support, and children under 26 or with a disability of 65 % or more) are beneficiaries.
- People who are neither insured nor beneficiaries can still be covered if they show income below the limit set by regulation. Those who meet none of the conditions can access healthcare by paying a fee through a special agreement.
- Foreigners without a residence permit will still be treated in emergencies for serious illness or accidents, for pregnancy, childbirth and postpartum care, and those under 18 will be treated on the same terms as Spanish nationals.
- The National Health System service portfolio is split into three levels: a basic portfolio of healthcare services fully funded publicly, a supplementary portfolio (medicines, orthopedic products, dietary products and non-urgent medical transport) with a user copayment, and a portfolio of accessory services, not essential, subject to copayment or reimbursement.
- A Care Guarantee Fund is created to compensate the autonomous communities for healthcare given to insured people who temporarily travel outside their region, with different rates for short and long stays.
- The copayment for pharmacy-dispensed medicines changes: generally between 40 % and 60 % of the price depending on income, and 10 % for pensioners, with monthly caps for them (8, 18 or 60 euros depending on income). Some groups are exempt, such as recipients of non-contributory pensions or unemployed people who have used up their benefits.
- Prescribing by active ingredient is reinforced: pharmacists must dispense the cheapest medicine in the group, with limited exceptions. The list of medicines excluded from public funding also grows, covering minor-symptom drugs and those with an over-the-counter version.
- For health staff, a State Register of Health Professionals is created, a uniform catalog of professional categories is approved to make it easier to move between health services, and Specific Training Areas are regulated in specialist training.
Who it affects
- People without Social Security coverage: They no longer get automatic public healthcare: they keep it only if they show low income, or can pay for a special agreement.
- Users of prescription medicines: They pay a higher copayment based on income, with monthly caps for pensioners and exemptions for vulnerable groups.
- Pensioners: They pay 10 % of medicine prices, with a monthly cap between 8 and 60 euros depending on income.
- Health professionals: They are listed in a state register and get a catalog of equivalent job categories to work in other regions.
- EU citizens living in Spain: To stay more than three months they must show sufficient resources and, in some cases, health insurance.
Words worth knowing
- Asegurado (insured person)
- Someone entitled to public healthcare because they work, are a pensioner, or receive a Social Security benefit.
- Cartera de servicios (service portfolio)
- The set of health services (appointments, tests, treatments, medicines) funded by the National Health System.
- Principio activo (active ingredient)
- The substance in a medicine that produces the healing effect. Prescribing by active ingredient allows choosing the cheapest brand with the same substance.
- Convenio especial (special agreement)
- An arrangement by which a person without public healthcare rights pays a fee to receive medical care.
- Prestación farmacéutica (pharmaceutical benefit)
- The set of medicines and health products the National Health System funds with a prescription.
It summarizes the law as published in the BOE. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.
- Introduced24 April 2012Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted8 May 2012The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
- Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenary8 May 2012All 350 deputies vote.
- Senateno dateThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEno dateIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 4 official steps on a timeline
17 May 2012
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Processing as a Government bill by the urgent procedure of Royal Decree-Law 16/2012, of April 20, on urgent measures to guarantee the sustainability of the National Health System and improve the quality and safety of its services.
This law had 2 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 12 of sitting 30· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Albacete More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 3 yes · 7 no
- Almería More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Asturias Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Ávila More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Badajoz More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 20 yes · 6 no
- Bizkaia Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Burgos More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Cantabria More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Ceuta More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Ciudad Real Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Girona More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Granada More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Guadalajara More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Huelva More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Huesca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Illes Balears More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Jaén More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- La Rioja More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- León More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Lleida More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Lugo More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 18 yes · 17 no
- Málaga More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Melilla More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Murcia More votes against 2 yes · 8 no
- Navarra More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Ourense More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Palencia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Salamanca More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Segovia Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 6 yes · 4 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Teruel More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Toledo More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Valencia/València More votes against 7 yes · 9 no
- Valladolid More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Zamora More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU, GIP and GUPyD. Against, most of Popular en el Congreso. 1 deputy voted differently from their group.
By province: in 9 most voted in favour; in 36, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 9
- Against: 36
- Tie: 7
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 110 | 96 in favour · 14 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 1 in favour · 4 did not vote |
| Mixto | 17 | 12 in favour · 5 did not vote |
| GC-CiU | 16 | 14 in favour · 2 did not vote |
| GIP | 11 | 10 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| GUPyD | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Popular en el Congreso | 184 | 1 in favour · 176 against · 7 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.
Published in the BOE: Royal Decree-Law 16/2012, of April 20, on urgent measures to guarantee the sustainability of the National Health System and improve the quality and safety of its services.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 130/000017
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 12 of sitting 30
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- BOE, BOE-A-2012-5403
The law as published.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.