Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Bill to move dependency care disputes to the social courts

Admitted step 2 of 7 · Unfinished

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 30 March 2015. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Socialista.

Official title: Private member's bill attributing competence to the social jurisdiction regarding care for persons in a situation of dependency.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000199· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would have social courts hear disputes over benefits under the dependency care law, described as faster, closer and cheaper for citizens. This transfer was already planned in Law 36/2011, but it was postponed until a later law that was never sent to the Cortes Generales (Spanish Parliament).
  2. It would remove the postponement in the seventh final provision of Law 36/2011, so social courts' jurisdiction over these matters would take effect as soon as the law enters into force.
  3. Administrative decisions that end the administrative process after the law takes effect could be challenged before social courts. Earlier decisions would remain with the administrative review courts.
  4. The law would enter into force two months after its publication in the Boletín Oficial del Estado (official gazette).

Who it affects

  • People in situations of dependency and their families: Could file claims before social courts, a route presented as faster and cheaper.
  • Administrations that manage dependency benefits: Would stop litigating before administrative review courts in new cases and would be treated procedurally like Social Security managing bodies.
  • Administrative review courts: Would stop hearing these matters for decisions made after the law takes effect.

Words worth knowing

Jurisdicción social
The courts that handle labor and Social Security disputes.
Jurisdicción contencioso-administrativa
The courts that review decisions made by public administrations.
Vía administrativa
The steps and decisions within the administration before going to court.
Ley de dependencia
Law 39/2006, which regulates aid and services for people who need help with daily life.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is unfinished.

  1. Introduced30 March 2015Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted7 April 2015The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
Mar 2015Jun 2015Sept 201511. 30 March 2015: Presentación22. 7 April 2015: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 07/04/2015 hasta 10/04/201533. 7 April 2015: Calificación44. 10 April 2015: Gobierno Contestación desde 10/04/2015 hasta 20/05/201555. 20 May 2015: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 20/05/2015 hasta 27/10/201566. 27 October 2015: Concluido - (Caducado) desde 27/10/2015 hasta 20/11/2015

Was there a plenary vote?

We have no plenary vote linked to this law in the Congreso’s data.

What happens next

What happens now?

The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.

It was presented again:

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.