Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Rules to monitor food quality and punish food fraud in Spain

BOE step 7 of 7 · Passed

It is a government bill. Introduced by the Government. It was introduced on 10 April 2015. Introduced by: Gobierno.

Official title: Government bill for the defense of food quality.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000144· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The law sets the basic rules to defend food quality in Spain, including a penalty system, and fulfills the European Union requirement that member states establish effective, proportionate and dissuasive sanctions against food fraud.
  2. It applies to all food marketed in Spain, processed or not, in facilities such as factories, packing plants, wholesale warehouses, broker offices and transport between them. It excludes hygiene and food safety matters, genetically modified organisms, sales to the final consumer, foreign trade and primary production.
  3. Quality control is carried out through official controls by the authorities, self-monitoring by operators, and self-monitoring by sector associations or cooperatives. Operators must have a self-monitoring system with documented procedures, a sampling and analysis plan, and traceability, and must keep that information for at least six months.
  4. Inspectors, public officials with the status of agents of the authority, can request documents, take samples and temporarily seize noncompliant goods. Companies must allow inspections and provide information and samples, and precautionary measures must be confirmed, modified or lifted within fifteen days at most.
  5. Violations are classified as minor, serious or very serious. Minor ones are punished with a warning or a fine of up to €4,000; serious ones with fines from €4,001 to €150,000; and very serious ones from €150,001 to €3,000,000. The fine can never be lower than the illegal profit obtained.
  6. It creates the Food Quality Coordination Board (Mesa de Coordinación de la Calidad Alimentaria), attached to the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Environment, to coordinate official controls between the state and the autonomous communities, with common criteria, annual reports and the RICAL computer system.

Who it affects

  • Food companies: factories, packers, wholesale warehouses, importers and brokers: They must have self-monitoring and traceability systems, allow inspections, and can be fined up to €3,000,000.
  • Inspection and certification bodies: They must be accredited by the Spanish national accreditation body (ENAC) and file a responsible declaration valid nationwide.
  • State and regional public administrations: They must coordinate official controls through the Coordination Board and share information through RICAL and the RIICA network.
  • Inspectors and state security forces: They carry out inspections, draw up reports with probative value, and can take precautionary measures such as seizing goods.

Words worth knowing

Trazabilidad (traceability)
The ability to follow a food product through every stage: where it comes from, where it has been and where it goes.
Autocontrol (self-monitoring)
A system the company itself sets up to check that its processes meet quality rules.
Medidas cautelares (precautionary measures)
Temporary measures, such as seizing goods, taken while a possible violation is being investigated.
Declaración responsable (responsible declaration)
A document by which an entity declares to the administration that it meets the requirements needed to start its activity.
Multas coercitivas (coercive fines)
Fines repeated over time to force someone to comply with an obligation, separate from the penalty for the violation.

It summarizes the law as published in the BOE. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.

  1. Introduced10 April 2015Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted14 April 2015The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendments17 April 2015Groups propose changes.
  4. Committee10 June 2015A committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenaryno dateAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senate24 June 2015The Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOE21 July 2015It is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 10 official steps on a timeline
Apr 2015May 2015Jun 201511. 10 April 2015: Presentación22. 14 April 2015: Comisión de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente Publicación desde 14/04/2015 hasta 17/04/201533. 14 April 2015: Calificación44. 17 April 2015: Comisión de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente Enmiendas desde 17/04/2015 hasta 19/06/201555. 10 June 2015: Comisión de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente Mesa - Calificación desde 10/06/2015 hasta 10/06/201566. 10 June 2015: Comisión de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente Debate de totalidad desde 10/06/2015 hasta 18/06/201577. 19 June 2015: Comisión de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente Informe desde 19/06/2015 hasta 22/06/201588. 22 June 2015: Comisión de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente Aprobación con competencia legislativa plena desde 22/06/2015 hasta 24/06/201599. 24 June 2015: Senado desde 24/06/2015 hasta 21/07/20151010. 21 July 2015: Concluido - (Aprobado con modificaciones) desde 21/07/2015 hasta 08/09/2015

18 June 2015

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 135 yes · 175 no

Voted on: Request by the Plenary of the Chamber to take over the deliberation and final vote on the Government bill for the defense of food quality, at the request of the Socialist Parliamentary Group.

This law had 2 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 29 of sitting 273· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU, GIP and GUPyD. Against, most of Popular en el Congreso. 1 deputy voted differently from their group.

By province: in 9 most voted in favour; in 38, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 9
  • Against: 38
  • Tie: 5
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista108
93 in favour · 15 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 in favour
Mixto18
10 in favour · 1 against · 7 did not vote
GC-CiU16
13 in favour · 3 did not vote
GIP11
9 in favour · 2 did not vote
GUPyD5
5 in favour
Popular en el Congreso185
174 against · 11 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.

The same initiative in the other chamber:

Published in the BOE: Law 28/2015, of July 30, for the defense of food quality.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.