Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Changes to criminal procedure to speed up justice and expand appeals

BOE step 7 of 7 · Passed

It is a government bill. Introduced by the Government. It was introduced on 13 March 2015. Introduced by: Gobierno.

Official title: Government bill amending the Criminal Procedure Act to expedite criminal justice and strengthen procedural guarantees.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000138· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. Joining cases through connection is limited: non-connected crimes committed by the same person can only be tried together if the public prosecutor requests it and the judge finds it convenient, avoiding mega-trials.
  2. Police reports for crimes with no known offender are no longer sent automatically to court: police keep them, except for serious crimes such as those against life, sexual freedom or corruption, or if there are leads after 72 hours.
  3. Maximum time limits for the investigation phase are set: six months for simple cases and eighteen for complex ones, with possible extensions. The mere expiry of the deadline does not lead to dismissal of the case.
  4. A new acceptance-of-decree procedure is created: if the prosecutor proposes a fine, community service or driving ban, and the accused accepts with a lawyer, the court turns the proposal into a final judgment without a trial.
  5. An autonomous forfeiture procedure is regulated, allowing seizure of assets from crime even when the offender cannot be tried, for example if they died or are on the run. Third parties affected are protected, and the Asset Recovery and Management Office is created.
  6. A second instance is generalized: judgments by the Provincial Courts (Audiencias Provinciales) and the Criminal Chamber of the National Court can be appealed. Cassation appeals are also expanded, and final judgments can be reviewed when the European Court of Human Rights finds they violated rights.

Who it affects

  • People investigated or charged with minor or less serious crimes: They can end the case early by accepting the prosecutor's proposed sentence, with a lawyer.
  • Victims and complainants: They are told their complaint with no known offender may not reach court, and they can file it again with the prosecutor's office or an investigating court.
  • Third parties who own seized or forfeited assets: They can take part in the criminal case and appeal if the forfeiture affects them.
  • People convicted at trial by Provincial Courts or the National Court: They get a second tier: they can appeal the judgment to a higher court.
  • Judicial Police and the Public Prosecutor's Office: New rules on when to send police reports and who leads the investigation of assets for forfeiture.

Words worth knowing

Instrucción (investigation phase)
The first stage of a criminal case, where the judge investigates the facts before deciding whether there will be a trial.
Atestado (police report)
A report the police write with what they know and have done about a crime.
Decomiso (forfeiture)
A court-ordered removal of assets that come from a crime or were used to commit it.
Recurso de casación (cassation appeal)
An appeal to the Supreme Court to unify how the law is interpreted, not to retry the case.
Conexidad (connection of cases)
A link between several crimes that allows them to be tried together in a single case.

It summarizes the law as published in the BOE. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.

  1. Introduced13 March 2015Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted16 March 2015The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendments20 March 2015Groups propose changes.
  4. Committee24 April 2015A committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenary2 June 2015All 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senate11 June 2015The Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOE1 October 2015It is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 13 official steps on a timeline
Mar 2015Apr 2015May 2015Jun 2015Jul 2015Aug 2015Sept 201511. 13 March 2015: Presentación22. 16 March 2015: Comisión de Justicia Publicación desde 16/03/2015 hasta 20/03/201533. 16 March 2015: Calificación44. 16 March 2015: Mesa del Congreso Calificación por el Presidente desde 16/03/2015 hasta 16/03/201555. 20 March 2015: Comisión de Justicia Enmiendas desde 20/03/2015 hasta 20/05/201566. 24 April 2015: Comisión de Justicia Mesa - Calificación desde 24/04/2015 hasta 24/04/201577. 24 April 2015: Comisión de Justicia Debate de totalidad desde 24/04/2015 hasta 30/04/201588. 20 May 2015: Comisión de Justicia Informe desde 20/05/2015 hasta 26/05/201599. 26 May 2015: Comisión de Justicia Dictamen desde 26/05/2015 hasta 02/06/20151010. 2 June 2015: Pleno Aprobación desde 02/06/2015 hasta 11/06/20151111. 11 June 2015: Senado desde 11/06/2015 hasta 02/09/20151212. 2 September 2015: Pleno Enmiendas o veto del Senado desde 02/09/2015 hasta 01/10/20151313. 1 October 2015: Concluido - (Aprobado con modificaciones) desde 01/10/2015 hasta 20/10/2015

1 October 2015

How did the plenary vote?

More votes in favour 193 yes · 98 no · 15 abst.

Voted on: Remaining amendments.

This law had 34 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 46 of sitting 289· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of GIP, GUPyD and Popular en el Congreso. Against, most of Socialista and Vasco (EAJ-PNV). 5 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 41 most voted in favour; in 5, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 41
  • Against: 5
  • Abstained: 1
  • Tie: 5
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista108
1 in favour · 92 against · 15 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
3 against · 2 did not vote
Mixto18
1 in favour · 2 against · 5 abst. · 10 did not vote
GC-CiU16
10 abst. · 6 did not vote
GIP11
7 in favour · 4 did not vote
GUPyD5
5 in favour
Popular en el Congreso185
179 in favour · 1 against · 5 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.

The same initiative in the other chamber:

Published in the BOE: Law 41/2015, of October 5, amending the Criminal Procedure Act to streamline criminal justice and strengthen procedural guarantees.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.