What it is
Changes to criminal procedure to speed up justice and expand appeals
It is a government bill. Introduced by the Government. It was introduced on 13 March 2015. Introduced by: Gobierno.
Official title: Government bill amending the Criminal Procedure Act to expedite criminal justice and strengthen procedural guarantees.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000138· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- Joining cases through connection is limited: non-connected crimes committed by the same person can only be tried together if the public prosecutor requests it and the judge finds it convenient, avoiding mega-trials.
- Police reports for crimes with no known offender are no longer sent automatically to court: police keep them, except for serious crimes such as those against life, sexual freedom or corruption, or if there are leads after 72 hours.
- Maximum time limits for the investigation phase are set: six months for simple cases and eighteen for complex ones, with possible extensions. The mere expiry of the deadline does not lead to dismissal of the case.
- A new acceptance-of-decree procedure is created: if the prosecutor proposes a fine, community service or driving ban, and the accused accepts with a lawyer, the court turns the proposal into a final judgment without a trial.
- An autonomous forfeiture procedure is regulated, allowing seizure of assets from crime even when the offender cannot be tried, for example if they died or are on the run. Third parties affected are protected, and the Asset Recovery and Management Office is created.
- A second instance is generalized: judgments by the Provincial Courts (Audiencias Provinciales) and the Criminal Chamber of the National Court can be appealed. Cassation appeals are also expanded, and final judgments can be reviewed when the European Court of Human Rights finds they violated rights.
Who it affects
- People investigated or charged with minor or less serious crimes: They can end the case early by accepting the prosecutor's proposed sentence, with a lawyer.
- Victims and complainants: They are told their complaint with no known offender may not reach court, and they can file it again with the prosecutor's office or an investigating court.
- Third parties who own seized or forfeited assets: They can take part in the criminal case and appeal if the forfeiture affects them.
- People convicted at trial by Provincial Courts or the National Court: They get a second tier: they can appeal the judgment to a higher court.
- Judicial Police and the Public Prosecutor's Office: New rules on when to send police reports and who leads the investigation of assets for forfeiture.
Words worth knowing
- Instrucción (investigation phase)
- The first stage of a criminal case, where the judge investigates the facts before deciding whether there will be a trial.
- Atestado (police report)
- A report the police write with what they know and have done about a crime.
- Decomiso (forfeiture)
- A court-ordered removal of assets that come from a crime or were used to commit it.
- Recurso de casación (cassation appeal)
- An appeal to the Supreme Court to unify how the law is interpreted, not to retry the case.
- Conexidad (connection of cases)
- A link between several crimes that allows them to be tried together in a single case.
It summarizes the law as published in the BOE. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.
- Introduced13 March 2015Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted16 March 2015The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments20 March 2015Groups propose changes.
- Committee24 April 2015A committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenary2 June 2015All 350 deputies vote.
- Senate11 June 2015The Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOE1 October 2015It is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 13 official steps on a timeline
1 October 2015
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Remaining amendments.
This law had 34 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 46 of sitting 289· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes in favour 5 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Albacete More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 8 yes · 4 no
- Almería More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Araba/Álava More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Asturias More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Ávila More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Badajoz More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Barcelona More votes against 7 yes · 8 no · 7 abst.
- Bizkaia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Burgos More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Cáceres More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 5 yes · 2 no
- Cantabria More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Córdoba Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cuenca More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Girona More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Granada More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Huelva More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Huesca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Illes Balears More votes in favour 5 yes · 3 no
- Jaén Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- La Rioja More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Las Palmas More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- León More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Lleida More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Lugo More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 25 yes · 8 no
- Málaga More votes in favour 6 yes · 3 no
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 8 yes · 2 no
- Navarra More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Ourense More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Pontevedra More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Salamanca More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Segovia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 5 yes · 4 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona Tie 2 yes · 2 no · 2 abst.
- Teruel More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Toledo More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 11 yes · 4 no · 1 abst.
- Valladolid More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 5 yes · 2 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of GIP, GUPyD and Popular en el Congreso. Against, most of Socialista and Vasco (EAJ-PNV). 5 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 41 most voted in favour; in 5, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 41
- Against: 5
- Abstained: 1
- Tie: 5
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 108 | 1 in favour · 92 against · 15 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 3 against · 2 did not vote |
| Mixto | 18 | 1 in favour · 2 against · 5 abst. · 10 did not vote |
| GC-CiU | 16 | 10 abst. · 6 did not vote |
| GIP | 11 | 7 in favour · 4 did not vote |
| GUPyD | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Popular en el Congreso | 185 | 179 in favour · 1 against · 5 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.
The same initiative in the other chamber:
- X Legislature, Senate Government bill amending the Criminal Procedure Act to expedite criminal justice and strengthen procedural guarantees.
Published in the BOE: Law 41/2015, of October 5, amending the Criminal Procedure Act to streamline criminal justice and strengthen procedural guarantees.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000138
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 46 of sitting 289
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- BOE, BOE-A-2015-10726
The law as published.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.