What it is
More electronic justice, changes to small claims and debt deadlines
It is a government bill. Introduced by the Government. It was introduced on 27 February 2015. Introduced by: Gobierno.
Official title: Government bill reforming Law 1/2000, of 7 January, on Civil Procedure.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000133· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- As of January 1, 2016, all justice professionals and judicial and prosecutorial offices must use electronic systems to file documents and carry out court notifications. Paper becomes the exception.
- Electronic filings can be submitted any day of the year, around the clock, with an automatic receipt showing date and time. If the system fails without notice, filings can be made on paper the next business day.
- Court representatives (procuradores) can carry out and certify court notifications with the same effect as court staff, acting personally and without delegation under the supervision of the judicial secretary. Whoever starts a lawsuit must state whether they want their Procurador A Spanish court representative who handles procedural steps on behalf of a party, alongside the lawyer. to handle notifications; if they say nothing, court staff will do it.
- The verbal proceeding (a simplified small claims type of trial) changes: the defendant answers in writing within ten days, rules are set for closing arguments and appeals on evidence decisions, and parties may waive the hearing if the court finds it appropriate.
- In payment order proceedings against consumers, the judge can examine abusive contract terms on their own initiative before demanding payment, after hearing both parties. The same applies to enforcing judgments and arbitration awards.
- The general statute of limitations for personal claims is cut to five years from when the obligation can be enforced. The new period also applies to claims arising before the law takes effect.
- Legal aid is strengthened: victims of gender violence Violence a woman suffers from a current or former partner because she is a woman., terrorism and human trafficking, minors, and people with intellectual disabilities or mental illness are entitled to it without proving lack of resources, with advice from the moment of filing a complaint and the same lawyer in all proceedings. The commissions may check income and assets with tax, cadastre, social security and registry authorities, with the applicant's consent.
- Civil servants may represent themselves in administrative litigation to defend their employment rights, except in cases involving dismissal of irremovable civil servants. The court fees law is also adjusted to allow paying the fee within the correction period.
Who it affects
- Justice professionals (lawyers, procuradores, notaries, etc.) and judicial and prosecutorial offices: Required to use electronic systems for filings and communications as of January 1, 2016.
- Citizens going to court: They may choose electronic communication with the courts as of January 1, 2017; paper filings remain possible for those not required to go electronic.
- Consumers: Judges can review abusive contract terms on their own initiative in payment order and enforcement proceedings affecting them.
- Anyone with debts or claims to collect: The general time limit to bring personal claims in court becomes five years.
- Victims of gender violence, terrorism and trafficking, minors, and people with intellectual disabilities or mental illness: Access to legal aid without proving lack of resources, with advice from the moment of filing a complaint.
Words worth knowing
- Procurador
- A Spanish court representative who handles procedural steps on behalf of a party, alongside the lawyer.
- Juicio verbal
- A simplified, faster type of Spanish civil trial for smaller claims or special matters such as evictions.
- Proceso monitorio
- A fast procedure to claim documented money debts, starting with a payment demand to the debtor.
- Cláusula abusiva
- Abusive contract term imposed by the stronger party (usually a business) that unfairly harms the consumer.
- Prescripción
- Statute of limitations: losing the right to sue after a set period of time.
- gender violence
- Violence a woman suffers from a current or former partner because she is a woman.
It summarizes the law as published in the BOE. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.
- Introduced27 February 2015Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted3 March 2015The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments6 March 2015Groups propose changes.
- Committee13 April 2015A committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenaryno dateAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senate17 June 2015The Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOE1 October 2015It is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 11 official steps on a timeline
1 October 2015
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Remaining amendments.
This law had 10 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 32 of sitting 289· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes in favour 5 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Albacete More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 8 yes · 4 no
- Almería More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Araba/Álava Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Asturias More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Ávila More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Badajoz More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Barcelona More votes against 8 yes · 9 no · 6 abst.
- Bizkaia Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Burgos More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Cáceres More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no
- Cantabria More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Córdoba Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cuenca More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no
- Gipuzkoa Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Girona Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Granada More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Huelva More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Huesca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Illes Balears More votes in favour 5 yes · 3 no
- Jaén Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- La Rioja More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Las Palmas More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- León More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Lleida More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Lugo More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 24 yes · 9 no
- Málaga More votes in favour 6 yes · 3 no
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 8 yes · 2 no
- Navarra More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Ourense More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Pontevedra More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Salamanca More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Segovia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 5 yes · 4 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona Tie 2 yes · 2 no · 2 abst.
- Teruel More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Toledo More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 11 yes · 4 no
- Valladolid More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 5 yes · 2 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of GIP, GUPyD and Popular en el Congreso. Against, most of Socialista and Mixto. 4 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 42 most voted in favour; in 1, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 42
- Against: 1
- Abstained: 1
- Tie: 8
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 108 | 91 against · 1 abst. · 16 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 4 abst. · 1 did not vote |
| Mixto | 18 | 1 in favour · 4 against · 2 abst. · 11 did not vote |
| GC-CiU | 16 | 10 abst. · 6 did not vote |
| GIP | 11 | 7 in favour · 4 did not vote |
| GUPyD | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Popular en el Congreso | 185 | 181 in favour · 4 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.
The same initiative in the other chamber:
- X Legislature, Senate Government bill reforming Law 1/2000, of 7 January, on Civil Procedure.
Published in the BOE: Law 42/2015, of October 5, amending Law 1/2000, of January 7, on Civil Procedure.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000133
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 32 of sitting 289
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- BOE, BOE-A-2015-10727
The law as published.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.