What it is
Reform of the Spanish Forestry Law: forest management, fires and the Tagus-Segura transfer
It is a government bill. Introduced by the Government. It was introduced on 12 January 2015. Introduced by: Gobierno.
Official title: Government bill amending Law 43/2003, of 21 November, on Forests.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000128· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- Forests are now considered green infrastructure and their multifunctionality is recognized: they produce resources, protect soil, water and biodiversity, and society as a whole benefits.
- Forest planning is simplified: small forests can join model management plans approved by the autonomous community and count as managed forests, without needing a costly individual plan.
- A National Forestry Council is created as an advisory body, and the Sectoral Conference on Agriculture and Rural Development is kept to coordinate the State with the autonomous communities.
- A new figure is created, the montes de socios (partner forests): private forests shared among people, some of them unknown. Known owners can form a management board to run the forest and prevent its abandonment, and investigate who owns the vacant shares.
- After a fire, changing the forest use of the land is banned for 30 years, with very limited exceptions that must be approved by law and with compensatory measures restoring an equivalent forest area.
- Fines are toughened: both the recovery time of the damage and its economic cost are now weighed. The penalty will be the higher of the set fine or twice the cost of the damage, and anyone marketing illegal timber also loses it (confiscation).
- Forestry companies are defined: groups of owners who transfer forest use rights in exchange for a share of the profits. They get a 10% corporate income tax The personal income tax (IRPF in Spain): what people pay on what they earn from work, business or savings. deduction for conservation expenses and investments.
- Clear rules are set for the Tagus-Segura water transfer: four levels based on water stored in the Entrepeñas and Buendía reservoirs, with an annual cap of 650 cubic hectometers and a floor of 400 cubic hectometers below which no transfer is allowed.
Who it affects
- Forest owners, especially owners of small or shared forests: They can use cheaper model management plans, form management boards or create forestry companies with tax benefits.
- Forestry companies and industries: They must register and meet obligations on timber legality; otherwise they face fines and confiscation.
- Irrigators and water supplies in the Tagus and Segura basins: They have fixed rules on when and how much water can be transferred.
- Hunters and anglers: A National Game Management Strategy and a Spanish register of hunting and fishing offenders are created.
- Public administrations and forest agents: Their coordination, inspection, policing and firefighting powers are reorganized.
Words worth knowing
- Monte catalogado
- Public forest listed in the Catalog of Public Utility Forests for protecting soil, water or biodiversity; it enjoys special protection.
- Monte protector
- Private forest meeting conditions similar to public utility forests, so it also receives special protection.
- Dominio público forestal
- Public forest land that cannot be sold or acquired by private parties through prescription.
- Pro indiviso
- Property shared by several people without dividing the specific parts belonging to each one.
- Declaración responsable
- A document in which someone declares before the administration that they comply with the law, allowing them to act without prior authorization.
- income tax
- The personal income tax (IRPF in Spain): what people pay on what they earn from work, business or savings.
It summarizes the law as published in the BOE. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.
- Introduced12 January 2015Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted20 January 2015The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments23 January 2015Groups propose changes.
- Committee14 April 2015A committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenaryno dateAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senate13 May 2015The Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOE8 July 2015It is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 11 official steps on a timeline
8 July 2015
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Amendments to the sole article, paragraph sixty-three.
This law had 6 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 35 of sitting 278· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Albacete More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Almería More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Araba/Álava Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Asturias More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no · 3 abst.
- Ávila More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Badajoz More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Barcelona More votes against 6 yes · 13 no · 8 abst.
- Bizkaia Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Burgos More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Cáceres More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Cádiz More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Cantabria More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Córdoba More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Cuenca More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Gipuzkoa Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Girona More votes against 1 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Granada More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Huelva More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Huesca More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Illes Balears More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Jaén More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- La Rioja More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Las Palmas More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- León More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Lleida Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Lugo More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Madrid More votes in favour 22 yes · 2 no · 9 abst.
- Málaga More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Navarra More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Ourense More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Palencia More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Pontevedra More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Salamanca More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Segovia More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Sevilla More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no · 4 abst.
- Soria More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Tarragona More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Teruel Tie 0 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Toledo More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 9 yes · 2 no · 2 abst.
- Valladolid More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Zamora More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of GUPyD and Popular en el Congreso. Against, most of Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU, GIP and Sin grupo. 1 deputy voted differently from their group.
By province: in 38 most voted in favour; in 2, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 38
- Against: 2
- Abstained: 1
- Tie: 11
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 107 | 99 abst. · 8 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 3 against · 2 did not vote |
| Mixto | 19 | 1 in favour · 7 against · 11 did not vote |
| GC-CiU | 15 | 12 against · 3 did not vote |
| GIP | 11 | 9 against · 2 did not vote |
| GUPyD | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Sin grupo | 1 | 1 against |
| Popular en el Congreso | 185 | 178 in favour · 7 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.
The same initiative in the other chamber:
- X Legislature, Senate Government bill amending Law 43/2003, of 21 November, on Forests.
Presented before in:
- VIII Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Passed Reform of Spain's forestry law: fires, protection and prosecutors
- VIII Legislature, Senate Government bill amending Law 43/2003, of 21 November, on Forests.
Published in the BOE: Law 21/2015, of July 20, amending Law 43/2003, of November 21, on Forests.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000128
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 35 of sitting 278
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- BOE, BOE-A-2015-8146
The law as published.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.