Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

How Spain enforces criminal rulings from other EU countries

BOE step 7 of 7 · Passed

It is a government bill. Introduced by the Government. It was introduced on 14 March 2014. Introduced by: Gobierno.

Official title: Government bill on the mutual recognition of criminal resolutions in the European Union.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000086· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The law requires Spanish judicial authorities to recognize and enforce criminal orders and rulings correctly transmitted by other EU member states, unless a specific legal ground for refusal applies. In turn, they can send Spanish rulings to other states for enforcement there.
  2. It regulates nine mutual recognition instruments: the European arrest warrant, custodial sentences, supervised release, alternatives to pretrial detention, the European protection order, preventive freezing and securing of evidence, confiscation, financial penalties, and the European investigation order.
  3. For a list of serious crimes (terrorism, drug trafficking, corruption, cybercrime, among others), Spanish judges will not check whether the act is also a crime in Spain, provided the maximum penalty in the issuing state is at least three years in prison.
  4. Recognition or enforcement can only be refused on specific legal grounds, such as an existing final ruling for the same acts (Non bis in idem The rule that prevents a person from being tried or punished twice for the same acts.), a penalty that has expired under Spanish law, an incomplete certificate, or an immunity.
  5. The European arrest warrant is processed urgently: if the person consents to surrender, the court decision must be made within ten days of the hearing; if not, within sixty days of arrest, extendable by thirty more.
  6. Prison sentences issued in one member state can be served in another to help rehabilitate the convicted person, usually with their consent, and time already served is deducted.
  7. The European protection order allows protective measures for a victim to remain effective if the victim moves to another EU state, where a judge will adopt equivalent measures.
  8. The law repeals earlier laws that separately regulated the European arrest warrant, freezing and securing of evidence, financial penalties, and confiscation, bringing everything into a single text.

Who it affects

  • People wanted or convicted in another EU state: They can be surrendered, serve their sentence or measures in another country, or be monitored from Spain, with safeguards such as a hearing, a lawyer, and maximum time limits.
  • Victims of crime: Their protective measures can follow them if they move to another member state, and they can receive compensation included in financial penalties.
  • Spanish judges and prosecutors: They must transmit, recognize, and enforce these instruments within set deadlines and only refuse on specific legal grounds.
  • Ministry of Justice: It acts as the central authority for assistance, authorizes transfers through Spain, and receives statistical information on these instruments.

Words worth knowing

Reconocimiento mutuo (mutual recognition)
The principle by which a court ruling from one EU country is accepted and enforced in the others almost automatically, without reviewing the merits of the case.
Doble tipificación (double criminality)
Checking that the act punished abroad is also a crime in Spain. For certain serious crimes this check is no longer required.
Non bis in idem
The rule that prevents a person from being tried or punished twice for the same acts.
Principio de especialidad (rule of specialty)
The rule that prevents a surrendered person from being prosecuted or convicted for prior offenses other than the one that led to their surrender, with exceptions.
Prisión provisional (pretrial detention)
Temporary imprisonment of a person while their criminal case is being resolved, before any conviction.

It summarizes the law as published in the BOE. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.

  1. Introduced14 March 2014Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted18 March 2014The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendments21 March 2014Groups propose changes.
  4. Committee30 May 2014A committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenaryno dateAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senate24 June 2014The Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOE30 October 2014It is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 9 official steps on a timeline
Mar 2014Apr 2014May 2014Jun 2014Jul 2014Aug 2014Sept 201411. 14 March 2014: Presentación22. 18 March 2014: Comisión de Justicia Publicación desde 18/03/2014 hasta 21/03/201433. 18 March 2014: Calificación44. 21 March 2014: Comisión de Justicia Enmiendas desde 21/03/2014 hasta 30/05/201455. 30 May 2014: Comisión de Justicia Informe desde 30/05/2014 hasta 18/06/201466. 18 June 2014: Comisión de Justicia Aprobación con competencia legislativa plena desde 18/06/2014 hasta 24/06/201477. 24 June 2014: Senado desde 24/06/2014 hasta 15/10/201488. 15 October 2014: Pleno Enmiendas o veto del Senado desde 15/10/2014 hasta 30/10/201499. 30 October 2014: Concluido - (Aprobado con modificaciones) desde 30/10/2014 hasta 03/12/2014

30 October 2014

How did the plenary vote?

More votes in favour 315 yes · 0 no · 4 abst.

Voted on: The Senate amendments are voted on jointly

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 221· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU, GIP, GUPyD and Popular en el Congreso. 4 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 52 most voted in favour; in 0, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 52
  • Against: 0
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista110
101 in favour · 9 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 in favour
Mixto18
9 in favour · 4 abst. · 5 did not vote
GC-CiU16
13 in favour · 3 did not vote
GIP11
9 in favour · 2 did not vote
GUPyD5
5 in favour
Popular en el Congreso185
173 in favour · 12 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.

The same initiative in the other chamber:

Published in the BOE: Law 23/2014, of 20 November, on the mutual recognition of criminal judgments in the European Union

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.