What it is
Controlling how long Spanish public authorities take to pay suppliers
BOE step 7 of 7 · PassedIt is a government bill. Introduced by the Government. It was introduced on 24 September 2013. Introduced by: Gobierno.
Official title: Organic Government bill on the control of commercial debt in the public sector.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000063· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The law expands the principle of financial sustainability: it is no longer enough to control public financial debt, commercial debt must also be controlled, meaning what public authorities owe their suppliers. Commercial debt is considered sustainable when the average payment period does not exceed the maximum deadline set by the late-payment rules.
- All public authorities and their related or dependent entities and bodies must publish their average payment period to suppliers and have a treasury plan that includes the forecast of payments to suppliers. If the average payment period exceeds the maximum deadline, they must include in their treasury plan the monthly amount they will devote to payments and the spending cuts or revenue increases needed to bring it down.
- Automatic measures are created for the Autonomous Communities: if their average payment period exceeds the maximum deadline by more than 30 days for two consecutive months, the Ministry of Finance and Public Administrations issues an alert communication. If the problem persists, spending increases can be blocked, state authorization for long-term borrowing can be required and, as a last resort, resources from the financing systems can be withheld to pay suppliers directly.
- In local corporations, the audit office (Órgano interventor The official who internally checks that a local corporation's spending is legal and within budget.) monitors compliance with the average payment period. If it detects delays of more than 30 days beyond the maximum deadline for two consecutive months, it alerts the administration with financial guardianship and the local government board; if the problem continues, resources from the State tax participation can be withheld to pay suppliers.
- The maximum payment deadline for suppliers is, at the time the law comes into force, thirty days. In addition, a more flexible limit is set on the monthly withholdings or deductions the State can make from the financing system resources of the Autonomous Communities when they fail to meet the average payment period.
- The law includes other measures: fee exemptions for the Santander 2014 Sailing World Championship, control of public entities not subject to audits, changes to port fees, amendments to the transparency law and to the law on State law enforcement bodies, and import duty relief for provisioning products in the Canary Islands.
Who it affects
- All public authorities and their related or dependent entities and bodies: They must publish their average payment period to suppliers, include payment forecasts in their treasury plans and take action if they exceed the maximum deadline.
- Autonomous Communities: If they pay suppliers late, they can receive alert communications, see their spending blocked, need state authorization to borrow, or have resources withheld to pay suppliers directly.
- Local corporations: Their audit offices monitor the average payment period and, if they pay late persistently, State resources can be withheld to pay their suppliers.
- Suppliers of public authorities: They are the beneficiaries: the law aims to ensure they are paid within the maximum thirty-day deadline.
- Organizers and participants of the Santander 2014 Sailing World Championship: They are exempt from paying certain fees and charges between July 1 and September 30, 2014.
Words worth knowing
- Deuda comercial
- What public authorities owe their suppliers for goods and services they have not yet paid for.
- Periodo medio de pago
- The average time a public authority takes to pay its suppliers.
- Plan de tesorería
- A document planning the money coming in and out of a public authority, including forecast payments to suppliers.
- Órgano interventor
- The official who internally checks that a local corporation's spending is legal and within budget.
- Tutela financiera
- The power of an administration (usually the Autonomous Community) to oversee and correct the financial situation of local corporations.
It summarizes the law as published in the BOE. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.
- Introduced24 September 2013Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted1 October 2013The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments4 October 2013Groups propose changes.
- Committee25 October 2013A committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenary14 November 2013All 350 deputies vote.
- Senate21 November 2013The Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOE19 December 2013It is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 12 official steps on a timeline
19 December 2013
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Vote on the Government bill on the control of commercial debt in the public sector as a whole, given its organic nature.
This law had 29 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 18 of sitting 159· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes in favour 5 yes · 3 no
- Albacete More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 8 yes · 4 no
- Almería More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Araba/Álava More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Asturias More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Ávila More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Badajoz More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Barcelona More votes against 6 yes · 22 no · 1 abst.
- Bizkaia More votes against 1 yes · 6 no
- Burgos More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 5 yes · 3 no
- Cantabria More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Girona More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Granada More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Huelva More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Huesca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Illes Balears More votes in favour 5 yes · 3 no
- Jaén Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- La Rioja More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Las Palmas More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- León More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Lleida More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Lugo More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 21 yes · 13 no
- Málaga More votes in favour 6 yes · 4 no
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 8 yes · 2 no
- Navarra Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Ourense More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Pontevedra More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Segovia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Sevilla More votes against 5 yes · 6 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Teruel More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Toledo More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 10 yes · 5 no
- Valladolid More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of GUPyD and Popular en el Congreso. Against, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU and GIP. 6 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 39 most voted in favour; in 8, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 39
- Against: 8
- Tie: 5
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 110 | 1 in favour · 101 against · 8 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 against |
| Mixto | 18 | 1 in favour · 14 against · 1 abst. · 2 did not vote |
| GC-CiU | 16 | 15 against · 1 did not vote |
| GIP | 11 | 9 against · 1 abst. · 1 did not vote |
| GUPyD | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Popular en el Congreso | 185 | 180 in favour · 2 abst. · 3 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.
The same initiative in the other chamber:
- X Legislature, Senate Organic Government bill on the control of commercial debt in the public sector.
Published in the BOE: Organic Law 9/2013, of December 20, on the control of commercial debt in the public sector.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000063
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 18 of sitting 159
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- BOE, BOE-A-2013-13425
The law as published.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.