What it is
Improves social protection for part-time workers and touches transport and unemployment
BOE step 7 of 7 · PassedIt is a government bill. Introduced by the Government. It was introduced on 12 September 2013. Introduced by: Gobierno.
Official title: Government bill for the protection of part-time workers and other urgent measures in the economic and social order (originating from Royal Decree-Law 11/2013, of 2 August).
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000060· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- It changes how contributions are counted for part-time workers to qualify for benefits such as retirement or maternity. A coefficient based on the share of the workday worked is applied, to equalize treatment with full-time workers.
- The new contribution rule also applies to benefits already denied for not meeting the minimum required contribution period and to applications still being processed.
- To receive unemployment benefits, people must register as job seekers and keep that registration for the whole period they receive benefits. It is made clear that leaving Spain for up to fifteen days a year does not remove the benefit, and that longer stays or moves abroad can suspend it if the managing body authorizes them.
- The penalty system is adapted to the new unemployment requirements and electronic notices are strengthened when the worker has given prior consent. Notifying work incompatible with unemployment benefits must be done before starting the work.
- For transfers, changes in working conditions, suspensions, collective dismissals and non-application of collective agreements, the consultation with workers takes place in a single negotiating committee of up to thirteen members, even if several workplaces are affected.
- It clarifies when a collective dismissal is null and void, and allows court rulings declaring it null to be enforced directly, without prior individual lawsuits.
- It caps increases in Aena airport fees through 2018, reforms how railway fees are calculated, and allows RENFE-Operadora to advance money to victims of the train accident of July 24, 2013.
- Subsidized housing loans transferred to SAREB The company that manages assets from banking restructuring, that is, troubled assets transferred by financial institutions. keep their state aid, and more local entities and county councils can pay their suppliers through the supplier payment fund.
Who it affects
- Part-time workers: Their contribution periods for benefits are now counted in proportion to their hours, with new rules and retroactive application to earlier denials.
- Unemployment benefit recipients: They must register and stay registered as job seekers to receive and keep benefits, with new rules on travel abroad and penalties.
- Companies: Consultations with worker representatives take place in a single negotiating committee of up to thirteen members, and they must notify collective dismissals and suspensions in advance.
- RENFE-Operadora and railway companies: They can advance payments to victims of the July 24, 2013 rail accident and must have victim assistance plans.
- Subsidized housing holders and local entities: Loans transferred to SAREB keep their housing aid, and local entities with debts can join the supplier payment mechanism.
Words worth knowing
- Coeficiente de parcialidad (part-time coefficient)
- The percentage that part-time hours represent compared with a comparable full-time worker; used to calculate counted contribution days.
- Despido colectivo (collective dismissal)
- Termination of contracts affecting a significant number of workers in a company for economic, technical, organizational or production reasons.
- Período de consultas (consultation period)
- Phase in which the company negotiates with worker representatives before adopting measures such as a collective dismissal or contract suspension.
- Cánones ferroviarios (railway fees)
- Fees railway companies pay to use the tracks and rail infrastructure.
- SAREB
- The company that manages assets from banking restructuring, that is, troubled assets transferred by financial institutions.
It summarizes the law as published in the BOE. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.
- Introduced12 September 2013Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted17 September 2013The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments20 September 2013Groups propose changes.
- Committee22 October 2013A committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenary28 November 2013All 350 deputies vote.
- Senate12 December 2013The Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOE20 February 2014It is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 12 official steps on a timeline
20 February 2014
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Remaining amendments from the Senate
This law had 44 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 7 of sitting 167· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Albacete More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no · 4 abst.
- Almería More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Asturias More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no · 3 abst.
- Ávila More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Badajoz More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Barcelona More votes in favour 6 yes · 5 no · 18 abst.
- Bizkaia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no · 4 abst.
- Burgos More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Cáceres More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Cádiz More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Cantabria More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Córdoba More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Cuenca More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Gipuzkoa Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Girona Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 4 abst.
- Granada More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Huelva More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Huesca More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Illes Balears More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Jaén More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- La Rioja More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Las Palmas More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- León More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Lleida More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Lugo More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Madrid More votes in favour 15 yes · 3 no · 10 abst.
- Málaga More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no · 3 abst.
- Melilla No count 0 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Navarra More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Ourense More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Palencia More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Pontevedra More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Salamanca More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Segovia More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Sevilla More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no · 5 abst.
- Soria More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Tarragona More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 4 abst.
- Teruel More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Toledo More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 9 yes · 2 no · 4 abst.
- Valladolid More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Zamora More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Popular en el Congreso. Against, most of Mixto and GIP. 5 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 39 most voted in favour; in 0, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 39
- Against: 0
- Abstained: 8
- Tie: 4
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 110 | 1 in favour · 1 against · 96 abst. · 12 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 abst. |
| Mixto | 18 | 1 in favour · 10 against · 2 abst. · 5 did not vote |
| GC-CiU | 16 | 15 abst. · 1 did not vote |
| GIP | 11 | 11 against |
| GUPyD | 5 | 5 abst. |
| Popular en el Congreso | 185 | 170 in favour · 15 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.
The same initiative in the other chamber:
- X Legislature, Senate Government bill for the protection of part-time workers and other urgent measures in the economic and social order (originating from Royal Decree-Law 11/2013, of 2 August).
Published in the BOE: Law 1/2014, of February 28, for the protection of part-time workers and other urgent measures in the economic and social order.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000060
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 7 of sitting 167
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- BOE, BOE-A-2014-2219
The law as published.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.