What it is
Judicial reform to save money and use fewer substitute judges
BOE step 7 of 7 · PassedIt is a government bill. Introduced by the Government. It was introduced on 11 October 2012. Introduced by: Gobierno.
Official title: Organic Law Bill on budget efficiency measures in the Administration of Justice, amending Organic Law 6/1985, of July 1, on the Judiciary.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000030· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The law wants almost all court rulings to be issued by career judges, with substitute judges and standby magistrates used only exceptionally.
- To cover absences and vacancies in multi-member courts, a calling order is set: first volunteer career judges, then territorially assigned judges and others, and only last, if budget allows, non-career standby magistrates.
- In single-judge courts, annual substitution plans are created for judges who volunteer, with schedules and rotations that avoid overlapping hearings. Judges' assemblies draft the plans and the General Council of the Judiciary (Consejo General del Poder Judicial) approves them.
- The Judicial School will have three phases: theory, supervised internships, and a period in which trainee judges perform substitutions and reinforcements. Each phase must be passed to move to the next.
- Approved applicants without a post are renamed from jueces adjuntos to jueces en expectativa de destino (judges awaiting assignment), and they take priority over substitute judges in call-ups.
- Professional substitutions will be paid, at 80% of the destination allowance of the court being substituted. Vacation, leave and sick pay rules for judges and court staff are also revised.
Who it affects
- Judges and magistrates: They can do paid voluntary substitutions and reinforcements, and their vacation, leave and sick pay rules change.
- Judge applicants: Their training at the Judicial School now has three phases, and those without a post become judges awaiting assignment.
- Substitute judges and standby magistrates: They will be called only exceptionally and if there is budget.
- Court staff of the Administration of Justice: Their vacation, leave and sick pay are adjusted, and the December 2012 extra pay is suspended.
- The general public: Court rulings will almost always be issued by professional judges.
Words worth knowing
- Magistrado suplente
- A retired judge or person outside the judicial career called to complete panels in multi-member courts.
- Juez sustituto
- A person not permanently in the judicial career who temporarily covers a judge's absence or vacancy.
- Comisión de servicios
- A temporary assignment by which a judge performs duties in another court without leaving their own.
- Órganos unipersonales
- Courts with a single judge, as opposed to multi-member collegiate courts.
- Señalamientos
- Trials and hearings already scheduled on a court's calendar.
It summarizes the law as published in the BOE. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.
- Introduced11 October 2012Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted16 October 2012The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments19 October 2012Groups propose changes.
- Committee12 November 2012A committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenary26 November 2012All 350 deputies vote.
- Senate29 November 2012The Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOE20 December 2012It is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 11 official steps on a timeline
29 November 2012
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Vote on the whole of the Government bill as it has an organic character.
This law had 26 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 25 of sitting 74· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes in favour 5 yes · 2 no
- Albacete More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 7 yes · 3 no
- Almería More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Araba/Álava More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Asturias Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Ávila More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Badajoz More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Barcelona More votes against 6 yes · 19 no
- Bizkaia Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Burgos More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no
- Cantabria More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Gipuzkoa Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Girona Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Granada More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Huelva Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Huesca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Illes Balears More votes in favour 5 yes · 3 no
- Jaén Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- La Rioja More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Las Palmas More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no
- León More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Lleida More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Lugo More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 17 yes · 13 no
- Málaga More votes in favour 6 yes · 4 no
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 7 yes · 2 no
- Navarra More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Ourense More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Pontevedra More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Segovia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Sevilla More votes against 5 yes · 6 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Teruel More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Toledo More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 8 yes · 6 no
- Valladolid More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Popular en el Congreso. Against, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU, GIP and GUPyD. 1 deputy voted differently from their group.
By province: in 38 most voted in favour; in 5, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 38
- Against: 5
- Tie: 9
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 110 | 92 against · 18 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 1 against · 4 did not vote |
| Mixto | 18 | 1 in favour · 5 against · 12 did not vote |
| GC-CiU | 16 | 11 against · 5 did not vote |
| GIP | 11 | 10 against · 1 did not vote |
| GUPyD | 5 | 5 against |
| Popular en el Congreso | 185 | 177 in favour · 8 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.
The same initiative in the other chamber:
- X Legislature, Senate Organic Law Bill on budget efficiency measures in the Administration of Justice, amending Organic Law 6/1985, of July 1, on the Judiciary.
Published in the BOE: Organic Law 8/2012, of December 27, on budget efficiency measures in the Administration of Justice, amending Organic Law 6/1985, of July 1, on the Judiciary.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000030
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 25 of sitting 74
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- BOE, BOE-A-2012-15648
The law as published.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.