What it is
Tougher penalties for tax and Social Security fraud
It is a government bill. Introduced by the Government. It was introduced on 3 August 2012. Introduced by: Gobierno.
Official title: Organic Government bill amending Organic Law 10/1995, of 23 November, of the Penal Code, in matters of transparency and the fight against tax fraud and in Social Security.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000017· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- Political parties and unions are no longer excluded from the general criminal liability regime for legal entities, so they can be criminally punished in the cases provided by law.
- The crime against the Public Treasury is reformed: regularizing your tax situation (acknowledging and paying the full debt on time) removes criminal liability, and a criminal case no longer by itself blocks the Administration from collecting the debt.
- A new aggravated form of the crime against the Public Treasury is created, with prison terms of two to six years, for frauds over 600,000 euros, committed within a criminal organization or through shell companies or tax havens. The six-year maximum penalty raises the statute of limitations to ten years.
- For crimes against Social Security, the amount triggering criminal liability drops to 50,000 euros and an aggravated form with two to six years in prison is added. A new specific crime for defrauding Social Security benefits is also created, punished with six months to three years in prison, or two to six years in serious cases.
- The crime against workers' rights is reformed to punish those who employ workers on a large scale without registering them with Social Security or without work authorization, with prison terms of six months to six years.
- A new crime punishes public authorities and officials who falsify the accounting or economic information of their public entity, with fines and disqualification, and one to four years in prison if economic harm is caused. Certificates related to Social Security and the Public Treasury are also excluded from the crime of certificate falsification.
Who it affects
- Taxpayers and companies: They can avoid criminal prosecution if they fully regularize their debt before the Administration or courts act; serious frauds over 600,000 euros carry higher penalties.
- Employers and Social Security debtors: The Social Security crime now applies from 50,000 euros, with aggravated penalties for organized schemes and fake companies.
- Political parties and unions: They can be held criminally liable as legal entities for unlawful acts by their representatives or administrators.
- Workers and law-abiding companies: Criminal punishment for those who compete unfairly by employing workers without Social Security registration or work permits.
- Public authorities and officials: New penalties for falsifying the economic information of public entities or passing on misleading information to third parties.
Words worth knowing
- Prescripción (statute of limitations)
- The maximum period to prosecute a crime. Once the time passes, the offender can no longer be punished.
- Regularización tributaria (tax regularization)
- Acknowledging and paying the full debt to the Tax Agency before an inspection or complaint begins.
- Tipo agravado (aggravated offense)
- A version of the crime with a harsher penalty because aggravating circumstances are present.
- Paraíso fiscal (tax haven)
- A territory where almost no taxes are paid, used to hide money or the people responsible.
- Persona jurídica (legal entity)
- An organization, such as a company or association, that can be criminally punished as if it were a person.
It summarizes the law as published in the BOE. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.
- Introduced3 August 2012Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted4 September 2012The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments7 September 2012Groups propose changes.
- Committee24 October 2012A committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenary7 November 2012All 350 deputies vote.
- Senate15 November 2012The Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOE20 December 2012It is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 12 official steps on a timeline
20 December 2012
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Vote on the whole of the Government bill as it has an organic character.
This law had 21 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 33 of sitting 80· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes in favour 5 yes · 3 no
- Albacete More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 8 yes · 3 no
- Almería More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Araba/Álava More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Asturias More votes against 3 yes · 4 no · 1 abst.
- Ávila More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Badajoz More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Barcelona More votes against 7 yes · 18 no
- Bizkaia More votes against 1 yes · 6 no
- Burgos More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 5 yes · 2 no
- Cantabria More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Girona More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Granada More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Huelva More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Huesca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Illes Balears More votes in favour 5 yes · 2 no
- Jaén More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- La Rioja More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Las Palmas More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no
- León More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Lleida More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Lugo More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 17 yes · 15 no
- Málaga More votes in favour 6 yes · 4 no
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 8 yes · 2 no
- Navarra Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Ourense More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Pontevedra More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Segovia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Sevilla More votes against 5 yes · 7 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Teruel More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Toledo More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 9 yes · 7 no
- Valladolid More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Popular en el Congreso. Against, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU, GIP and GUPyD. 2 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 39 most voted in favour; in 9, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 39
- Against: 9
- Tie: 4
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 110 | 100 against · 10 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 against |
| Mixto | 18 | 1 in favour · 10 against · 1 abst. · 6 did not vote |
| GC-CiU | 16 | 12 against · 4 did not vote |
| GIP | 11 | 10 against · 1 did not vote |
| GUPyD | 5 | 5 against |
| Popular en el Congreso | 185 | 182 in favour · 3 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.
The same initiative in the other chamber:
- X Legislature, Senate Government Organic Bill amending Organic Law 10/1995, of November 23, of the Penal Code, in matters of transparency and the fight against tax fraud and in Social Security.
Published in the BOE: Organic Law 7/2012, of December 27, amending Organic Law 10/1995, of November 23, the Penal Code, regarding transparency and the fight against tax fraud and Social Security fraud.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000017
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 33 of sitting 80
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- BOE, BOE-A-2012-15647
The law as published.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.