12 March 2014, in the Senate

Motion urging the Government to continue working with the Autonomous Communities on the harmonization of the classification and categorization of rural establishments within the National and Comprehensive Tourism Plan (PNIT).

More votes in favour 204 yes · 23 no · 11 abst.

More votes in favour: 204 yes and 23 no, a margin of 181. 11 abstentions.

When we cannot be sure which majority was needed, we do not say whether this means it “passed”: the official file does not say.

Source: Senate, vote 1004 of sitting 48· updated 10 Nov

The chamber

Who voted how?

204 in favour, 23 against. 11 abstentions. 6 voted differently from their group.

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the senators from your province vote?

Only senators elected in a province or island appear. Senators appointed by regional parliaments have no province.

Or see how most of each province voted

The groups

How did each group vote?

In favour, most of Socialista and Popular. Against, most of Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto and Convergencia i Unio.

Result by parliamentary group
Group	Seats	How it voted
Socialista	60	60 in favour
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)	5	5 against
Mixto	11	4 in favour · 5 against · 2 abst.
Convergencia i Unio	13	13 against
Entesa Pel Progrés	9	9 abst.
Popular	140	140 in favour

Sources

Where does all this come from?

Official wording of what was voted on: Moción por la que se insta al Gobierno a continuar trabajando con las Comunidades Autónomas en la homogeneización de la clasificación y categorización de establecimientos rurales dentro del Plan Nacional e Integral de Turismo (PNIT).

Senate, vote 1004 of sitting 48
The count and every seat’s vote.

Retrieved 10 November 2026

The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.

Read the full method · Report an error

Motion urging the Government to continue working with the Autonomous Communities on the harmonization of the classification and categorization of rural establishments within the National and Comprehensive Tourism Plan (PNIT). Automatic translation · See the Spanish original

Who voted how?

How did the senators from your province vote?

How did each group vote?

Where does all this come from?

Motion urging the Government to continue working with the Autonomous Communities on the harmonization of the classification and categorization of rural establishments within the National and Comprehensive Tourism Plan (PNIT).