Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.
Sign in

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Private member's bill to amend Laws 16/2003, of May 28, on the Cohesion and Quality of the National Health System, and 41/2002, of November 14, basic regulation of patient autonomy and rights and obligations in matters of clinical information and documentation.

No stage no data

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens.

Follow this law

Source: Senate, file 622/000043· updated 12 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 0 of 7 steps. Its stage is not on record.

  1. Introducednot reachedSomeone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admittednot reachedThe Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.

7 May 2025

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 3 yes · 112 no · 145 abst.

Voted on: Private member's bill to amend Laws 16/2003, of May 28, on the Cohesion and Quality of the National Health System, and 41/2002, of November 14, basic regulation of patient autonomy and rights and obligations in matters of clinical information and documentation.

Source: Senate, vote 3 of sitting 50· updated 12 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Mixto. Against, most of Izquierdas Por la Independencia (Esquerra Republicana-euskal Herria Bildu), Izquierda Confederal (Más Madrid, Eivissa i Formentera Al Senat, Compromís, Agrupación Socialista Gomera y Geroa Bai), Socialista, Vasco en el Senado (EAJ-PNV) and Plural en el Senado Junts per Catalunya-coalición Canaria-agrupación Herreña Independiente-bloque Nacionalista Galego. 1 deputy voted differently from their group.

By province: in 0 most voted in favour; in 11, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 0
  • Against: 11
  • Abstained: 37
  • Tie: 4
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Izquierdas Por la Independencia (Esquerra Republicana-euskal Herria Bildu)9
9 against
Izquierda Confederal (Más Madrid, Eivissa i Formentera Al Senat, Compromís, Agrupación Socialista Gomera y Geroa Bai)6
6 against
Socialista87
87 against
Vasco en el Senado (EAJ-PNV)6
6 against
Plural en el Senado Junts per Catalunya-coalición Canaria-agrupación Herreña Independiente-bloque Nacionalista Galego7
4 against · 3 did not vote
Mixto4
3 in favour · 1 abst.
Popular en el Senado144
144 abst.

What happens next

What happens now?

The Congreso has not yet published which stage it is at.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We never say “passed” because of a vote: the files do not say which majority was needed.

Read the full method · Report an error