Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Government bill amending the Consolidated Text of the General Law on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and their Social Inclusion, approved by Royal Legislative Decree 1/2013, of 29 November, and Law 39/2006, of 14 December, on the Promotion of Personal Autonomy and Care for Persons in a Situation of Dependency, to extend and strengthen the rights of persons with disabilities to inclusion, autonomy, and universal accessibility in accordance with Article 49 of the Spanish Constitution.

No stage no data

It is a government bill. Introduced by the Government.

Source: Senate, file 621/000022· updated 12 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 0 of 7 steps. Its stage is not on record.

  1. Introducednot reachedSomeone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admittednot reachedThe Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.

9 September 2026

How did the plenary vote?

More votes in favour 235 yes · 0 no · 23 abst.

Voted on: Government bill amending the Consolidated Text of the General Law on the rights of persons with disabilities and their social inclusion, approved by Royal Legislative Decree 1/2013, of November 29, and Law 39/2006, of December 14, on the Promotion of Personal Autonomy and Care for persons in a situation of dependency, for the extension and strengthening of the rights of persons with disabilities to inclusion, autonomy and universal accessibility in accordance with Article 49 of the Spanish Constitution. PROCESSED BY THE URGENT PROCEDURE.

This law had 64 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all

Source: Senate, vote 66 of sitting 81· updated 12 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Socialista, Plural en el Senado Junts per Catalunya-coalición Canaria-agrupación Herreña Independiente-bloque Nacionalista Galego and Popular en el Senado. 7 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 50 most voted in favour; in 0, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 50
  • Against: 0
  • Abstained: 2
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Izquierdas Por la Independencia (Esquerra Republicana-euskal Herria Bildu)8
8 abst.
Izquierda Confederal (Más Madrid, Eivissa i Formentera Al Senat, Compromís, Agrupación Socialista Gomera y Geroa Bai)6
3 in favour · 3 abst.
Socialista85
85 in favour
Vasco en el Senado (EAJ-PNV)6
2 in favour · 4 abst.
Plural en el Senado Junts per Catalunya-coalición Canaria-agrupación Herreña Independiente-bloque Nacionalista Galego7
4 in favour · 3 abst.
Mixto7
2 in favour · 5 abst.
Popular en el Senado139
139 in favour

What happens next

What happens now?

The Congreso has not yet published which stage it is at.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We never say “passed” because of a vote: the files do not say which majority was needed.