Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Private member's bill to amend Royal Legislative Decree 6/2015, of 30 October, approving the consolidated text of the Law on Traffic, Circulation of Motor Vehicles and Road Safety, and Royal Decree 1428/2003, of 21 November, approving the General Circulation Regulation for the application and development of the consolidated text of the Law on traffic, circulation of motor vehicles and road safety, approved by Royal Legislative Decree 339/1990, of 2 March.

No stage no data

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens.

Source: Senate, file 622/000096· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 0 of 7 steps. Its stage is not on record.

  1. Introducednot reachedSomeone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admittednot reachedThe Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.

17 May 2023

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 3 yes · 226 no · 2 abst.

Voted on: Private member's bill to amend Royal Legislative Decree 6/2015, of 30 October, approving the consolidated text of the Law on Traffic, Circulation of Motor Vehicles and Road Safety, and Royal Decree 1428/2003, of 21 November, approving the General Circulation Regulation for the application and development of the consolidated text of the Law on traffic, circulation of motor vehicles and road safety, approved by Royal Legislative Decree 339/1990, of 2 March.

This law had 2 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all

Source: Senate, vote 123 of sitting 71· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Mixto. Against, most of Esquerra Republicana-euskal Herria Bildu, De Izquierda Confederal (Més per Mallorca, Más Madrid, Compromís, Geroa Bai y Agrupación Socialista Gomera), Socialista, Vasco en el Senado (EAJ-PNV), Nacionalista en el Senado Junts per Catalunya-coalición Canaria/partido Nacionalista Canario and Popular en el Senado. 2 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 0 most voted in favour; in 48, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 0
  • Against: 48
  • Tie: 2
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Esquerra Republicana-euskal Herria Bildu14
14 against
De Izquierda Confederal (Més per Mallorca, Más Madrid, Compromís, Geroa Bai y Agrupación Socialista Gomera)3
3 against
Socialista111
111 against
Vasco en el Senado (EAJ-PNV)9
9 against
Nacionalista en el Senado Junts per Catalunya-coalición Canaria/partido Nacionalista Canario2
2 against
Mixto5
3 in favour · 2 abst.
Popular en el Senado87
87 against

What happens next

What happens now?

The Congreso has not yet published which stage it is at.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We never say “passed” because of a vote: the files do not say which majority was needed.