Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Private member's bill for an Organic Law amending the Penal Code to eradicate forced or non-consensual sterilization of persons with disabilities who have been judicially incapacitated.

No stage no data

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens.

Source: Senate, file 622/000002· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 0 of 7 steps. Its stage is not on record.

  1. Introducednot reachedSomeone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admittednot reachedThe Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.

29 December 2020

How did the plenary vote?

More votes in favour 259 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.

Voted on: Private member's bill for an Organic Law amending the Penal Code to eradicate forced or non-consensual sterilization of persons with disabilities who have been judicially incapacitated.

Source: Senate, vote 78 of sitting 21· updated 11 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Esquerra Republicana-euskal Herria Bildu, Izquierda Confederal (Adelante Andalucía, Més per Mallorca, Más Madrid, Compromís, Geroa Bai y Catalunya en Comú Podem), Socialista, Vasco en el Senado (EAJ-PNV), Nacionalista en el Senado Junts per Catalunya-coalición Canaria/partido Nacionalista Canario, Mixto, Ciudadanos and Popular en el Senado. 1 deputy voted differently from their group.

By province: in 50 most voted in favour; in 0, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 50
  • Against: 0
  • Abstained: 1
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Esquerra Republicana-euskal Herria Bildu14
14 in favour
Izquierda Confederal (Adelante Andalucía, Més per Mallorca, Más Madrid, Compromís, Geroa Bai y Catalunya en Comú Podem)6
4 in favour · 2 did not vote
Socialista111
111 in favour
Vasco en el Senado (EAJ-PNV)10
9 in favour · 1 did not vote
Nacionalista en el Senado Junts per Catalunya-coalición Canaria/partido Nacionalista Canario6
5 in favour · 1 did not vote
Mixto7
7 in favour
Ciudadanos2
2 in favour
Democrático (Ciudadanos, Agrupación de Electores "Teruel Existe" y Partido Regionalista de Cantabria)3
1 in favour · 2 abst.
Popular en el Senado97
97 in favour

What happens next

What happens now?

The Congreso has not yet published which stage it is at.

The same initiative in the other chamber:

Presented before in:

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.