Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Government bill amending Law 26/2010, of July 16, on the regime of transfer of State taxes to the Autonomous Community of the Canary Islands and the determination of the scope and conditions of said transfer.

No stage no data

It is a government bill. Introduced by the Government.

Source: Senate, file 621/000070· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 0 of 7 steps. Its stage is not on record.

  1. Introducednot reachedSomeone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admittednot reachedThe Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.

22 December 2022

How did the plenary vote?

More votes in favour 249 yes · 4 no · 2 abst.

Voted on: Government bill amending Law 26/2010, of July 16, on the regime of transfer of State taxes to the Autonomous Community of the Canary Islands and on the determination of the scope and conditions of said transfer. PROCESSED BY THE URGENT PROCEDURE.

This law had 2 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all

Source: Senate, vote 303 of sitting 62· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Esquerra Republicana-euskal Herria Bildu, De Izquierda Confederal (Més per Mallorca, Más Madrid, Compromís, Geroa Bai y Agrupación Socialista Gomera), Socialista, Vasco en el Senado (EAJ-PNV), Nacionalista en el Senado Junts per Catalunya-coalición Canaria/partido Nacionalista Canario, Mixto, Democrático (Ciudadanos, Agrupación de Electores "Teruel Existe" y Partido Regionalista de Cantabria) and Popular en el Senado. 6 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 49 most voted in favour; in 0, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 49
  • Against: 0
  • Tie: 1
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Esquerra Republicana-euskal Herria Bildu15
13 in favour · 2 abst.
De Izquierda Confederal (Més per Mallorca, Más Madrid, Compromís, Geroa Bai y Agrupación Socialista Gomera)4
3 in favour · 1 did not vote
Socialista112
111 in favour · 1 against
Vasco en el Senado (EAJ-PNV)10
9 in favour · 1 did not vote
Nacionalista en el Senado Junts per Catalunya-coalición Canaria/partido Nacionalista Canario5
5 in favour
Mixto7
4 in favour · 3 against
Democrático (Ciudadanos, Agrupación de Electores "Teruel Existe" y Partido Regionalista de Cantabria)4
4 in favour
Popular en el Senado102
100 in favour · 2 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

The Congreso has not yet published which stage it is at.

The same initiative in the other chamber:

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.