What it is
Government bill on measures for the prevention and fight against tax fraud, transposing Directive (EU) 2016/1164 of the Council of 12 July 2016 laying down rules against tax avoidance practices that directly affect the functioning of the internal market, amending various tax regulations and regulations on gambling.
No stage no dataIt is a government bill. Introduced by the Government.
Source: Senate, file 621/000023· updated 11 Nov
We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 0 of 7 steps. Its stage is not on record.
- Introducednot reachedSomeone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admittednot reachedThe Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
23 June 2021
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Government bill on measures for the prevention and fight against tax fraud, transposing Directive (EU) 2016/1164 of the Council of 12 July 2016 laying down rules against tax avoidance practices that directly affect the functioning of the internal market, amending various tax regulations and regulations on gambling.
This law had 51 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all
Source: Senate, vote 109 of sitting 33· updated 11 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Albacete Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Almería Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Asturias More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Ávila More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Badajoz More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Barcelona Tie 0 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Burgos Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Cáceres Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no
- Cantabria More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Ceuta More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Córdoba More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no
- Cuenca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no
- Girona Tie 0 yes · 0 no · 4 abst.
- Granada More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Guadalajara Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Huelva More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Huesca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Illes Balears More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Jaén More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no
- La Rioja More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Las Palmas More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- León Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Lleida Tie 0 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Lugo More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no
- Málaga More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Melilla More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Murcia More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Navarra More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Ourense Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Palencia More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Pontevedra More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Salamanca No data
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Segovia Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Soria Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Teruel More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Toledo Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Valencia/València Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Valladolid Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Zamora More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of De Izquierda Confederal (Adelante Andalucía, Més per Mallorca, Más Madrid, Compromís, Geroa Bai y Agrupación Socialista Gomera), Socialista, Vasco en el Senado (EAJ-PNV) and Democrático (Ciudadanos, Agrupación de Electores "Teruel Existe" y Partido Regionalista de Cantabria). Against, most of Mixto and Popular en el Senado. 2 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 23 most voted in favour; in 12, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 23
- Against: 12
- Abstained: 4
- Tie: 12
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Esquerra Republicana-euskal Herria Bildu | 16 | 16 abst. |
| De Izquierda Confederal (Adelante Andalucía, Més per Mallorca, Más Madrid, Compromís, Geroa Bai y Agrupación Socialista Gomera) | 6 | 6 in favour |
| Socialista | 115 | 115 in favour |
| Vasco en el Senado (EAJ-PNV) | 10 | 10 in favour |
| Nacionalista en el Senado Junts per Catalunya-coalición Canaria/partido Nacionalista Canario | 6 | 1 in favour · 5 abst. |
| Mixto | 7 | 1 in favour · 5 against · 1 did not vote |
| Democrático (Ciudadanos, Agrupación de Electores "Teruel Existe" y Partido Regionalista de Cantabria) | 6 | 6 in favour |
| Popular en el Senado | 97 | 97 against |
What happens next
What happens now?
The Congreso has not yet published which stage it is at.
The same initiative in the other chamber:
- XIV Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Passed Anti-fraud law: cash limits, new taxes and tighter controls
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Senate, file 621/000023
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Senate, vote 109 of sitting 33
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.