Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Royal Decree-Law 1/2006, of 20 January, amending the tax rates of the tax on tobacco products.

Plenary step 5 of 7 · Rejected

It is a royal decree-law. It was introduced on 20 January 2006. Introduced by: Gobierno.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 130/000028· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 5 of 7 steps. It reached Plenary, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced20 January 2006Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted24 January 2006The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenary24 January 2006All 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 4 official steps on a timeline
Jan 200611. 20 January 2006: Presentación22. 24 January 2006: Calificación33. 24 January 2006: Pleno Convalidación desde 24/01/2006 hasta 09/02/200644. 9 February 2006: Concluido - (Derogado) desde 09/02/2006 hasta 17/02/2006

Was there a plenary vote?

We have no plenary vote linked to this law in the Congreso’s data.

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.