Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Motion following an urgent interpellation on the measures the Government will adopt to avoid exorbitant increases in the prices of energy products and their direct impact on the cost of living for families.

Plenary step 5 of 7· Rejected

It is a motion. It was introduced on 23 September 2026. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Mixto.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 173/000194· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 5 of 7 steps. It reached Plenary, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced23 September 2026Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted29 September 2026The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenary29 September 2026All 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 4 official steps on a timeline
Sept 202611. 23 September 2026: Presentación22. 29 September 2026: Calificación33. 29 September 2026: Pleno desde 29/09/2026 hasta 30/09/202644. 30 September 2026: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 30/09/2026 hasta 13/10/2026

30 September 2026

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 39 yes · 181 no · 126 abst.

Voted on: Point 3.

This law had 3 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 5 of sitting 202· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Plurinacional SUMAR, Republicano and Mixto. Against, most of Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Junts per Catalunya, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. 4 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 0 most voted in favour; in 35, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 0
  • Against: 35
  • Abstained: 5
  • Tie: 12
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu6
6 abst.
Plurinacional SUMAR26
25 in favour · 1 did not vote
Republicano7
7 in favour
Socialista121
120 abst. · 1 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 against
Junts per Catalunya7
6 against · 1 did not vote
Mixto9
6 in favour · 3 against
Popular en el Congreso137
1 in favour · 135 against · 1 did not vote
VOX32
32 against

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We never say “passed” because of a vote: the files do not say which majority was needed.