What it is
Motion following an urgent interpellation on the reform of the Framework Statute for statutory health service personnel, particularly regarding the update of the professional and salary classification of vocational training health personnel and management and services personnel, the reform of the professional career system, and the necessary funding to guarantee its application throughout the National Health System.
Plenary step 5 of 7· RejectedIt is a motion. It was introduced on 16 September 2026. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Mixto.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 173/000191· updated 11 Nov
We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 5 of 7 steps. It reached Plenary, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced16 September 2026Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted22 September 2026The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
- Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenary22 September 2026All 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 4 official steps on a timeline
23 September 2026
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Motion following an urgent interpellation by the Parliamentary Group Mixed (Ms. Valido García), on the reform of the Framework Statute of statutory staff of health services, in particular regarding the update of the professional and salary classification of vocational training health personnel and management and services personnel, the reform of the professional career system, and the financing necessary to guarantee its application throughout the National Health System.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 3 of sitting 200· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 7 abst.
- Albacete Tie 0 yes · 0 no · 4 abst.
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 0 yes · 2 no · 10 abst.
- Almería More votes against 0 yes · 1 no · 5 abst.
- Araba/Álava Tie 0 yes · 0 no · 4 abst.
- Asturias More votes against 0 yes · 1 no · 6 abst.
- Ávila Tie 0 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Badajoz More votes against 0 yes · 1 no · 4 abst.
- Barcelona More votes against 4 yes · 5 no · 23 abst.
- Bizkaia Tie 0 yes · 0 no · 8 abst.
- Burgos Tie 0 yes · 0 no · 4 abst.
- Cáceres Tie 0 yes · 0 no · 4 abst.
- Cádiz More votes against 0 yes · 1 no · 8 abst.
- Cantabria More votes against 0 yes · 1 no · 4 abst.
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 0 yes · 1 no · 4 abst.
- Ceuta Tie 0 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Ciudad Real More votes against 0 yes · 1 no · 4 abst.
- Córdoba More votes against 0 yes · 1 no · 5 abst.
- Cuenca Tie 0 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Gipuzkoa Tie 0 yes · 0 no · 5 abst.
- Girona More votes against 1 yes · 2 no · 3 abst.
- Granada Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 5 abst.
- Guadalajara More votes against 0 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Huelva More votes against 0 yes · 1 no · 4 abst.
- Huesca Tie 0 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Illes Balears More votes against 0 yes · 1 no · 7 abst.
- Jaén More votes against 0 yes · 1 no · 4 abst.
- La Rioja Tie 0 yes · 0 no · 4 abst.
- Las Palmas Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 6 abst.
- León Tie 0 yes · 0 no · 4 abst.
- Lleida Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Lugo Tie 0 yes · 0 no · 4 abst.
- Madrid More votes against 1 yes · 5 no · 31 abst.
- Málaga More votes against 0 yes · 2 no · 9 abst.
- Melilla Tie 0 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Murcia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no · 7 abst.
- Navarra More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 4 abst.
- Ourense Tie 0 yes · 0 no · 4 abst.
- Palencia Tie 0 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Pontevedra Tie 0 yes · 0 no · 7 abst.
- Salamanca Tie 0 yes · 0 no · 4 abst.
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 6 abst.
- Segovia Tie 0 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Sevilla More votes against 0 yes · 1 no · 11 abst.
- Soria Tie 0 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Tarragona More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 4 abst.
- Teruel Tie 0 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Toledo More votes against 0 yes · 1 no · 5 abst.
- Valencia/València More votes against 1 yes · 2 no · 13 abst.
- Valladolid More votes against 0 yes · 1 no · 4 abst.
- Zamora Tie 0 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Zaragoza More votes against 0 yes · 1 no · 6 abst.
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Republicano and Mixto. Against, most of Junts per Catalunya and VOX. 1 deputy voted differently from their group.
By province: in 0 most voted in favour; in 0, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 0
- Against: 0
- Abstained: 52
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 6 | 6 abst. |
| Plurinacional SUMAR | 26 | 26 abst. |
| Republicano | 7 | 7 in favour |
| Socialista | 121 | 121 abst. |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 4 abst. · 1 did not vote |
| Junts per Catalunya | 7 | 6 against · 1 did not vote |
| Mixto | 9 | 8 in favour · 1 against |
| Popular en el Congreso | 137 | 137 abst. |
| VOX | 32 | 32 against |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 173/000191
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 3 of sitting 200
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We never say “passed” because of a vote: the files do not say which majority was needed.