Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.
Sign in

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Motion following an urgent interpellation for the Government to explain the reasons why the Ministry for Ecological Transition and the Demographic Challenge has not fulfilled the parliamentary mandate to establish a schedule for the tendering and awarding of the works for the second phase of the Navarra Canal.

BOE step 7 of 7· Passed

It is a motion. It was introduced on 10 September 2026. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Mixto.

Follow

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 173/000190· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.

  1. Introduced10 September 2026Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted15 September 2026The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenary15 September 2026All 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senateno dateThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOE16 September 2026It is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 4 official steps on a timeline
Sept 202611. 10 September 2026: Presentación22. 15 September 2026: Calificación33. 15 September 2026: Pleno desde 15/09/2026 hasta 16/09/202644. 16 September 2026: Concluido - (Aprobado sin modificaciones) desde 16/09/2026 hasta 24/09/2026

16 September 2026

How did the plenary vote?

More votes in favour 172 yes · 17 no · 157 abst.

Voted on: Motion following an urgent interpellation by the Mixed Parliamentary Group (Mr. Catalán Higueras), for the Government to explain the reasons why the Ministry for the Ecological Transition and the Demographic Challenge has not fulfilled the parliamentary mandate to establish a schedule for the tendering and awarding of the works for the second phase of the Canal de Navarra.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 15 of sitting 198· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Popular en el Congreso and VOX. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Junts per Catalunya and Mixto. 6 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 32 most voted in favour; in 0, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 32
  • Against: 0
  • Abstained: 8
  • Tie: 12
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu6
6 against
Plurinacional SUMAR26
1 against · 23 abst. · 2 did not vote
Republicano7
7 abst.
Socialista121
120 abst. · 1 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 abst.
Junts per Catalunya7
6 against · 1 did not vote
Mixto9
3 in favour · 4 against · 2 abst.
Popular en el Congreso137
137 in favour
VOX32
32 in favour

What happens next

What happens now?

It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We never say “passed” because of a vote: the files do not say which majority was needed.

Read the full method · Report an error