Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Motion following an urgent interpellation on the Government's position regarding the need to allocate rearmament plan funds to strengthen public education.

Plenary step 5 of 7 · Rejected

It is a motion. It was introduced on 29 May 2025. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Mixto.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 173/000103· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 5 of 7 steps. It reached Plenary, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced29 May 2025Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted10 June 2025The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenary10 June 2025All 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 4 official steps on a timeline
May 202511. 29 May 2025: Presentación22. 10 June 2025: Calificación33. 10 June 2025: Pleno desde 10/06/2025 hasta 12/06/202544. 12 June 2025: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 12/06/2025 hasta 19/06/2025

12 June 2025

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 45 yes · 296 no · 7 abst.

Voted on: Motion following an urgent interpellation by the Mixed Parliamentary Group (Ms. Belarra Urteaga), regarding the Government's position on the need to allocate the funds of the rearmament plan to strengthen public education. Voted in the terms resulting from the incorporation of the amendment submitted by the Euskal Herria Bildu Parliamentary Group.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 7 of sitting 118· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Plurinacional SUMAR, Republicano and Mixto. Against, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Popular en el Congreso and VOX. 2 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 0 most voted in favour; in 51, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 0
  • Against: 51
  • Tie: 1
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu6
6 in favour
Plurinacional SUMAR27
27 in favour
Republicano7
7 in favour
Socialista120
119 against · 1 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 against
Junts per Catalunya7
7 abst.
Mixto8
5 in favour · 2 against · 1 did not vote
Popular en el Congreso137
137 against
VOX33
33 against

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.