Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Motion following an urgent interpellation for the Government to explain whether it will fulfill the obligation to present a Structural Fiscal Plan before September 20 and when it will submit it for validation in the Congress of Deputies.

Plenary step 5 of 7 · Rejected

It is a motion. It was introduced on 19 September 2024. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Popular en el Congreso.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 173/000047· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 5 of 7 steps. It reached Plenary, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced19 September 2024Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted24 September 2024The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenary24 September 2024All 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 4 official steps on a timeline
Sept 202411. 19 September 2024: Presentación22. 24 September 2024: Calificación33. 24 September 2024: Pleno desde 24/09/2024 hasta 26/09/202444. 26 September 2024: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 26/09/2024 hasta 08/10/2024

26 September 2024

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 137 yes · 164 no · 44 abst.

Voted on: Point 2.

This law had 2 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 5 of sitting 63· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Popular en el Congreso. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Plurinacional SUMAR, Socialista, Junts per Catalunya and Mixto. 3 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 18 most voted in favour; in 16, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 18
  • Against: 16
  • Tie: 18
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu6
6 against
Plurinacional SUMAR27
27 against
Republicano6
6 abst.
Socialista120
120 against
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 abst.
Junts per Catalunya7
7 against
Mixto8
3 in favour · 4 against · 1 did not vote
Popular en el Congreso137
134 in favour · 3 did not vote
VOX33
33 abst.

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.