What it is

Motion following an urgent interpellation on the measures the Ministry of Territorial Policy and Democratic Memory will adopt to avoid being affected by the responsibility of its Minister in the management and control of the purchase of sanitary material during the pandemic caused by COVID-19, which is being investigated by the European Public Prosecutor's Office.

Plenary step 5 of 7 · Rejected

It is a motion. It was introduced on 14 March 2024. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Popular en el Congreso.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 173/000017· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 5 of 7 steps. It reached Plenary, and today it is rejected.

Introduced14 March 2024Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
Admitted19 March 2024The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
Plenary19 March 2024All 350 deputies vote.
Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.

See the 4 official steps on a timeline

21 March 2024

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 169 yes · 173 no · 1 abst.

Voted on: Motion following an urgent interpellation by the Popular Parliamentary Group in the Congress, on the measures the Ministry of Territorial Policy and Democratic Memory will adopt to avoid being affected by the responsibility of its Minister in the management and control of the purchase of medical supplies during the pandemic derived from COVID-19, which is being investigated by the European Public Prosecutor's Office.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 4 of sitting 33· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted

More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Popular en el Congreso and VOX. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Plurinacional SUMAR, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Junts per Catalunya and Mixto. 3 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 32 most voted in favour; in 11, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

In favour: 32
Against: 11
Tie: 9

Result by parliamentary group
Group	Seats	How it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu	6	6 against
Plurinacional SUMAR	27	25 against · 2 did not vote
Republicano	7	7 against
Socialista	120	119 against · 1 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)	5	5 against
Junts per Catalunya	7	6 against · 1 did not vote
Mixto	8	2 in favour · 5 against · 1 abst.
Popular en el Congreso	137	135 in favour · 2 did not vote
VOX	33	32 in favour · 1 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

Congreso de los Diputados, file 173/000017
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.

Retrieved 11 November 2026
Congreso de los Diputados, vote 4 of sitting 33
The count and every seat’s vote.

Retrieved 10 November 2026

The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.

Read the full method · Report an error