Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Motion following an urgent interpellation regarding the Government's responsibility in the events that led to the arrests for the alleged illegal collection of commissions in the sale of masks during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BOE step 7 of 7 · Passed

It is a motion. It was introduced on 29 February 2024. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Popular en el Congreso.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 173/000015· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.

  1. Introduced29 February 2024Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted5 March 2024The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenary5 March 2024All 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senateno dateThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOE14 March 2024It is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 4 official steps on a timeline
Feb 202411. 29 February 2024: Presentación22. 5 March 2024: Calificación33. 5 March 2024: Pleno desde 05/03/2024 hasta 14/03/202444. 14 March 2024: Concluido - (Aprobado con modificaciones) desde 14/03/2024 hasta 16/04/2024

14 March 2024

How did the plenary vote?

More votes in favour 171 yes · 160 no · 15 abst.

Voted on: Motion following an urgent interpellation by the Popular Parliamentary Group in the Congress, regarding the Government's responsibility in the facts that led to the arrests for the alleged illegal collection of commissions in the sale of masks during the COVID-19 pandemic. It is voted on in the terms resulting from the incorporation of the amendment submitted by the VOX Parliamentary Group.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 50 of sitting 29· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Popular en el Congreso and VOX. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Plurinacional SUMAR, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV) and Mixto. 3 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 32 most voted in favour; in 7, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 32
  • Against: 7
  • Tie: 13
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu6
5 against · 1 did not vote
Plurinacional SUMAR27
27 against
Republicano7
7 abst.
Socialista120
118 against · 2 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 against
Junts per Catalunya7
7 abst.
Mixto8
2 in favour · 5 against · 1 abst.
Popular en el Congreso137
136 in favour · 1 did not vote
VOX33
33 in favour

What happens next

What happens now?

It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.