What it is

Non-legislative motion for a State response to the national security crisis in Ceuta and to guarantee the future of Ceuta and Melilla.

Plenary step 5 of 7 · Rejected

It is a non-binding motion. It was introduced on 24 August 2026. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Popular en el Congreso.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 162/000833· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 5 of 7 steps. It reached Plenary, and today it is rejected.

Introduced24 August 2026Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
Admitted26 August 2026The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
Plenary31 August 2026All 350 deputies vote.
Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.

See the 5 official steps on a timeline

10 September 2026

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 170 yes · 175 no · 1 abst.

Voted on: Non-legislative motion by the Popular Parliamentary Group in the Congress, for a State response to the national security crisis in Ceuta and to guarantee the future of Ceuta and Melilla. Voted in the terms resulting from the incorporation of the amendment submitted by the Popular Parliamentary Group in the Congress.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 4 of sitting 196· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted

More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Popular en el Congreso and VOX. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Plurinacional SUMAR, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Junts per Catalunya and Mixto. 3 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 29 most voted in favour; in 10, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

In favour: 29
Against: 10
Tie: 13

Result by parliamentary group
Group	Seats	How it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu	6	6 against
Plurinacional SUMAR	26	26 against
Republicano	7	6 against · 1 did not vote
Socialista	121	119 against · 2 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)	5	5 against
Junts per Catalunya	7	7 against
Mixto	9	2 in favour · 6 against · 1 abst.
Popular en el Congreso	137	137 in favour
VOX	32	31 in favour · 1 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

Congreso de los Diputados, file 162/000833
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.

Retrieved 11 November 2026
Congreso de los Diputados, vote 4 of sitting 196
The count and every seat’s vote.

Retrieved 10 November 2026

The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.

Read the full method · Report an error

Non-legislative motion for a State response to the national security crisis in Ceuta and to guarantee the future of Ceuta and Melilla. Automatic translation · See the Spanish original