What it is

Non-legislative motion to guarantee the effective right to comprehensive sex education in compliance with Organic Law 1/2023, of 28 February, amending Organic Law 2/2010, of 3 March, on sexual and reproductive health and voluntary interruption of pregnancy.

Plenary step 5 of 7 · Rejected

It is a non-binding motion. It was introduced on 2 October 2025. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Mixto.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 162/000597· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 5 of 7 steps. It reached Plenary, and today it is rejected.

Introduced2 October 2025Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
Admitted7 October 2025The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
Plenary10 October 2025All 350 deputies vote.
Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.

See the 5 official steps on a timeline

26 February 2026

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 167 yes · 183 no

Voted on: Non-legislative motion of the Mixed Parliamentary Group (Ms. Belarra Urteaga), for the effective guarantee of the right to comprehensive sex education in compliance with Organic Law 1/2023, of February 28, amending Organic Law 2/2010, of March 3, on sexual and reproductive health and voluntary interruption of pregnancy. Voted in the terms of the transitory amendment presented by the Republican Parliamentary Group and the Mixed Parliamentary Group (Ms. Valido García and Ms. Belarra Urteaga).

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 164· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted

More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Plurinacional SUMAR, Republicano, Socialista and Mixto. Against, most of Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Junts per Catalunya, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. 1 deputy voted differently from their group.

By province: in 10 most voted in favour; in 30, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

In favour: 10
Against: 30
Tie: 12

Result by parliamentary group
Group	Seats	How it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu	6	6 in favour
Plurinacional SUMAR	26	26 in favour
Republicano	7	7 in favour
Socialista	121	121 in favour
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)	5	5 against
Junts per Catalunya	7	7 against
Mixto	8	7 in favour · 1 against
Popular en el Congreso	137	137 against
VOX	33	33 against

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

Congreso de los Diputados, file 162/000597
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.

Retrieved 11 November 2026
Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 164
The count and every seat’s vote.

Retrieved 10 November 2026

The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.

Read the full method · Report an error