What it is

Non-legislative motion on the responsible use of algorithms in real estate portals.

Plenary step 5 of 7 · Rejected

It is a non-binding motion. It was introduced on 20 March 2025. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Plurinacional SUMAR.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 162/000461· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 5 of 7 steps. It reached Plenary, and today it is rejected.

Introduced20 March 2025Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
Admitted25 March 2025The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
Plenary28 March 2025All 350 deputies vote.
Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.

See the 6 official steps on a timeline

19 November 2025

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 170 yes · 175 no · 1 abst.

Voted on: Non-legislative motion by the Plurinational SUMAR Parliamentary Group, on the responsible use of algorithms in real estate portals. Voted on in the terms of the transitory amendment submitted by the Socialist Parliamentary Group and the Plurinational SUMAR Parliamentary Group.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 148· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted

More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Plurinacional SUMAR, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV) and Mixto. Against, most of Junts per Catalunya, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. 1 deputy voted differently from their group.

By province: in 11 most voted in favour; in 30, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

In favour: 11
Against: 30
Tie: 11

Result by parliamentary group
Group	Seats	How it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu	6	6 in favour
Plurinacional SUMAR	26	26 in favour
Republicano	7	7 in favour
Socialista	120	119 in favour · 1 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)	5	5 in favour
Junts per Catalunya	7	7 against
Mixto	9	7 in favour · 1 abst. · 1 did not vote
Popular en el Congreso	137	137 against
VOX	33	31 against · 2 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

Congreso de los Diputados, file 162/000461
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.

Retrieved 11 November 2026
Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 148
The count and every seat’s vote.

Retrieved 10 November 2026

The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.

Read the full method · Report an error

Non-legislative motion on the responsible use of algorithms in real estate portals. Automatic translation · See the Spanish original