What it is

Non-legislative motion for the creation of a tax on emissions caused by the use of luxury means of transport.

Plenary step 5 of 7 · Rejected

It is a non-binding motion. It was introduced on 12 February 2025. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Plurinacional SUMAR.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 162/000432· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 5 of 7 steps. It reached Plenary, and today it is rejected.

Introduced12 February 2025Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
Admitted18 February 2025The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
Plenary21 February 2025All 350 deputies vote.
Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.

See the 5 official steps on a timeline

14 May 2025

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 43 yes · 290 no · 13 abst.

Voted on: Non-legislative motion by the Plurinational SUMAR Parliamentary Group, for the creation of a tax on emissions caused by the use of luxury means of transport. Voted in the terms of the transitory amendment presented by the Plurinational SUMAR Parliamentary Group and the Republican Parliamentary Group.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 111· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted

More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Plurinacional SUMAR, Republicano and Mixto. Against, most of Socialista, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. 2 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 0 most voted in favour; in 49, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

In favour: 0
Against: 49
Tie: 3

Result by parliamentary group
Group	Seats	How it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu	6	6 in favour
Plurinacional SUMAR	27	25 in favour · 2 did not vote
Republicano	7	7 in favour
Socialista	120	119 against · 1 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)	5	5 abst.
Junts per Catalunya	7	7 abst.
Mixto	8	5 in favour · 1 against · 1 abst. · 1 did not vote
Popular en el Congreso	137	137 against
VOX	33	33 against

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

Congreso de los Diputados, file 162/000432
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.

Retrieved 11 November 2026
Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 111
The count and every seat’s vote.

Retrieved 10 November 2026

The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.

Read the full method · Report an error

Non-legislative motion for the creation of a tax on emissions caused by the use of luxury means of transport. Automatic translation · See the Spanish original