Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Non-legislative motion for the Government to effectively and uniformly exercise its competences in matters of immigration throughout the State.

Plenary step 5 of 7 · Rejected

It is a non-binding motion. It was introduced on 5 February 2025. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Popular en el Congreso.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 162/000421· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 5 of 7 steps. It reached Plenary, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced5 February 2025Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted11 February 2025The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenary14 February 2025All 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 5 official steps on a timeline
Feb 2025Feb 2025Feb 2025Mar 2025Mar 202511. 5 February 2025: Presentación22. 11 February 2025: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 11/02/2025 hasta 14/02/202533. 11 February 2025: Calificación44. 14 February 2025: Pleno desde 14/02/2025 hasta 13/03/202555. 13 March 2025: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 13/03/2025 hasta 20/03/2025

13 March 2025

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 170 yes · 176 no

Voted on: Point 6.

This law had 6 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 7 of sitting 98· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Popular en el Congreso and VOX. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Plurinacional SUMAR, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Junts per Catalunya and Mixto. 1 deputy voted differently from their group.

By province: in 31 most voted in favour; in 11, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 31
  • Against: 11
  • Tie: 10
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu6
6 against
Plurinacional SUMAR27
27 against
Republicano7
7 against
Socialista120
119 against · 1 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
4 against · 1 did not vote
Junts per Catalunya7
7 against
Mixto8
1 in favour · 6 against · 1 did not vote
Popular en el Congreso137
136 in favour · 1 did not vote
VOX33
33 in favour

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.