Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Non-legislative motion on the creation of an Economic Information System for Collective Bargaining (SIENN) based on official administrative records.

Plenary step 5 of 7 · Rejected

It is a non-binding motion. It was introduced on 15 April 2024. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Plurinacional SUMAR.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 162/000206· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 5 of 7 steps. It reached Plenary, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced15 April 2024Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted24 April 2024The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenary26 April 2024All 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 5 official steps on a timeline
Apr 202411. 15 April 2024: Presentación22. 24 April 2024: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 24/04/2024 hasta 26/04/202433. 24 April 2024: Calificación44. 26 April 2024: Pleno desde 26/04/2024 hasta 30/05/202455. 30 May 2024: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 30/05/2024 hasta 06/06/2024

30 May 2024

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 165 yes · 171 no · 13 abst.

Voted on: Non-legislative motion by the Plurinational SUMAR Parliamentary Group, on the creation of an Economic Information System for Collective Bargaining (SIENN) based on official administrative records.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 21 of sitting 43· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Plurinacional SUMAR, Republicano, Socialista and Mixto. Against, most of Popular en el Congreso and VOX. 2 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 10 most voted in favour; in 30, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 10
  • Against: 30
  • Tie: 12
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu6
6 in favour
Plurinacional SUMAR27
27 in favour
Republicano7
7 in favour
Socialista120
120 in favour
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 abst.
Junts per Catalunya7
7 abst.
Mixto8
5 in favour · 1 against · 1 abst. · 1 did not vote
Popular en el Congreso137
137 against
VOX33
33 against

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.